Silsby J, Jordan G, Bayley G, Cook T M
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2006 Jun;61(6):576-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04643.x.
Airway manikins have traditionally been used for teaching mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. There is an increasing need to use manikins for training in procedures such as insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. We have assessed four new airway training manikins (latest versions of the Airway Trainer (Laerdal, Norway), Airway Management Trainer (Ambu, UK), 'Bill 1' (VBM, Germany) and Airsim (Trucorp, Ireland)) as simulators for insertion of the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway. Twenty volunteer anaesthetists inserted a size-4 laryngeal mask airway five times into each of the four manikins, in random order. Each insertion was assessed using objective and subjective tests. Subjective assessment varied widely but overall assessment indicated that the Airway Management Trainer was the poorest simulator for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. The 'Bill 1' and Airsim manikins performed best as simulators for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway, although realistic ventilation with 'Bill 1' was not possible.
气道模型传统上一直用于面罩通气和气管插管教学。现在越来越需要使用模型来培训诸如插入喉罩气道等操作。我们评估了四种新型气道训练模型(挪威Laerdal公司的气道训练器最新版本、英国Ambu公司的气道管理训练器、德国VBM公司的“Bill 1”以及爱尔兰Trucorp公司的Airsim)作为插入经典喉罩气道的模拟器。20名志愿麻醉医生以随机顺序将4号喉罩气道分别插入四种模型各5次。每次插入均通过客观和主观测试进行评估。主观评估差异很大,但总体评估表明,气道管理训练器是插入喉罩气道最差的模拟器。“Bill 1”和Airsim模型作为插入喉罩气道的模拟器表现最佳,不过“Bill 1”无法实现逼真的通气。