Gomez R S, Mendes T C B S
Departamento de Cirurgia-Faculdade de Medicina-UFMG- Avenida Alfredo Balena 190, Bairro Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte-Minas Gerais-Brazil.
Anaesthesia. 2006 Jun;61(6):591-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04647.x.
We report a case of accidental epidural anaesthesia as a complication of attempted brachial plexus blockade using a posterior approach in a 31-year-old man scheduled to undergo elective shoulder surgery. The block was inserted with the patient in the lateral position before induction of general anaesthesia. On emergence from anaesthesia, the patient could breathe but could not move his arms. He had no pain sensation from the fifth cervical dermatome to the third thoracic dermatome bilaterally; this resolved 8 h after surgery and he was discharged well 2 days later. Although proponents of the posterior approach to the brachial plexus claim that its use is associated with a lower incidence of significant complications, this case proves that the technique is not devoid of potentially serious complications.
我们报告了一例意外硬膜外麻醉病例,该病例是一名计划接受择期肩部手术的31岁男性,在尝试采用后路法进行臂丛神经阻滞时出现的并发症。在全身麻醉诱导前,患者处于侧卧位时进行了阻滞操作。麻醉苏醒后,患者能够呼吸,但无法移动双臂。他双侧从第五颈神经皮节到第三胸神经皮节均无疼痛感觉;术后8小时这种情况得到缓解,两天后他顺利出院。尽管支持臂丛神经后路法的人声称该方法使用时严重并发症的发生率较低,但该病例证明该技术并非没有潜在的严重并发症。