Suppr超能文献

髌股疼痛综合征患者本体感觉测试中试验次数的影响调查。

An investigation into the effect of number of trials during proprioceptive testing in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

作者信息

Selfe James, Callaghan Michael, McHenry Alec, Richards Jim, Oldham Jackie

机构信息

Department of Allied Health Professions, University of Central Lancashire, Preston Lancashire PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1218-24. doi: 10.1002/jor.20127.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of increasing the number of test trials in the assessment of knee joint position sense, in a group of patellofemoral patients, and second, to investigate the effects of joint angle and type of test. Thirty-two patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome were admitted to this study. Knee joint position sense was measured by performing an ipsilateral matching activity at target angles of 20 degrees and 60 degrees using two techniques; Passive Angle Reproduction (PAR), and Active Angle Reproduction (AAR). The results show that five repetitions are required for AAR and six for PAR. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference (p = 0.559) in the accuracy of angle reproduction for the two angles (60 degrees and 20 degrees ); however, there was a significant difference (p = 0.001) between the two types of test (AAR and PAR). The results of this study have implications for clinicians and researchers who examine knee joint proprioception as part of functional assessment in a variety of knee joint pathologies including PFPS. A "quick" one-off assessment of knee joint position sense may give erroneous data; subjects need to have several trials before a true picture of their proprioceptive status emerges. Type of testing performed, active or passive, is also important, although the angle of testing may not be relevant.

摘要

本研究的目的,一是调查增加测试次数对一组髌股关节患者膝关节位置觉评估的影响,二是调查关节角度和测试类型的影响。32名被诊断为髌股关节疼痛综合征的患者参与了本研究。通过使用被动角度重现(PAR)和主动角度重现(AAR)两种技术,在20度和60度的目标角度进行同侧匹配活动,来测量膝关节位置觉。结果显示,主动角度重现需要5次重复,被动角度重现需要6次重复。双向重复测量方差分析表明,两个角度(60度和20度)的角度重现准确性没有显著差异(p = 0.559);然而,两种测试类型(主动角度重现和被动角度重现)之间存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。本研究结果对临床医生和研究人员具有启示意义,他们在包括髌股关节疼痛综合征在内的各种膝关节病变的功能评估中,将膝关节本体感觉检查作为其中一部分。对膝关节位置觉进行一次“快速”的一次性评估可能会得出错误数据;在受试者本体感觉状态的真实情况显现之前,他们需要进行多次试验。所进行的测试类型,主动或被动,也很重要,尽管测试角度可能无关紧要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验