Adams Beth, Levy Ross, Rademaker Alfred E, Goldberg Leonard H, Alam Murad
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Dermatol Surg. 2006 May;32(5):682-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32141.x.
There are many closure techniques and suture types available to cutaneous surgeons. Evidence-based data are not available regarding the frequency of use of these techniques by experienced practitioners.
To quantify, by anatomic site, the frequency of use of common closure techniques and suture types by cutaneous surgeons.
A prospective survey of the members of the Association of Academic Dermatologic Surgeons that used length-calibrated visual-analog scales to elicit the frequency of use of specific suture techniques.
A response rate of 60% (61/101) indicated reliability of the received data. Epidermal layers were closed most often, in descending order, by simple interrupted sutures (38-50%), simple running sutures (37-42%), and vertical mattress sutures (3-8%), with subcuticular sutures used more often on the trunk and extremities (28%). The most commonly used superficial sutures were nylon (51%) and polypropylene (44%), and the most common absorbable suture was polyglactin 910 (73%). Bilayered closures, undermining, and electrocoagulation were used, on average, in 90% or more sutured repairs. The median diameters (defined as longest extent along any axis) of most final wound defects were 1.1 to 2.0 cm (56%) or 2.1 to 3.0 cm (37%). Fifty-four percent of wounds were repaired by primary closure, 20% with local flaps, and 10% with skin grafting, with the remaining 15% left to heal by second intent (10%) or referred for repair (5%). Experience-related differences were detected in defect size and closure technique: defects less than 2 cm in diameter were seen by less experienced surgeons, and defects greater than 2 cm by more experienced surgeons (Wilcoxon's rank-sum test: p=.02). But more experienced surgeons were less likely to use bilayered closures (r=-0.28, p=.036) and undermining (r=-0.28, p=.035).
There is widespread consensus among cutaneous surgeons regarding optimal suture selection and closure technique by anatomic location. More experienced surgeons tend to repair larger defects but, possibly because of their increased confidence and skill, rely on less complicated repairs.
皮肤外科医生可采用多种闭合技术和缝线类型。目前尚无关于经验丰富的从业者使用这些技术频率的循证数据。
按解剖部位量化皮肤外科医生使用常见闭合技术和缝线类型的频率。
对学术性皮肤外科医生协会成员进行前瞻性调查,使用长度校准视觉模拟量表来确定特定缝线技术的使用频率。
60%(61/101)的回复率表明所获数据具有可靠性。表皮层闭合最常用的方法,按使用频率从高到低依次为:单纯间断缝合(38 - 50%)、单纯连续缝合(37 - 42%)和垂直褥式缝合(3 - 8%),皮下缝合在躯干和四肢使用更为频繁(28%)。最常用的浅表缝线是尼龙线(51%)和聚丙烯线(44%),最常用的可吸收缝线是聚乙醇酸910(73%)。双层闭合、潜行分离和电凝平均用于90%或更多的缝合修复。大多数最终伤口缺损的中位直径(定义为沿任何轴的最长长度)为1.1至2.0厘米(56%)或2.1至3.0厘米(37%)。54%的伤口通过一期闭合修复,20%采用局部皮瓣,10%采用植皮,其余15%留待二期愈合(10%)或转诊修复(5%)。在缺损大小和闭合技术方面检测到与经验相关的差异:经验较少的外科医生处理直径小于2厘米的缺损,经验较丰富的外科医生处理直径大于2厘米的缺损(Wilcoxon秩和检验:p = 0.02)。但经验较丰富的外科医生较少使用双层闭合(r = -0.28,p = 0.036)和潜行分离(r = -0.28,p = 0.035)。
皮肤外科医生在根据解剖位置选择最佳缝线和闭合技术方面存在广泛共识。经验较丰富的外科医生倾向于修复更大的缺损,但可能由于他们信心和技能的提升,依赖于不太复杂的修复方法。