Hutton N, Wilson M H, Mellits E D, Baumgardner R, Wissow L S, Bonuccelli C, Holtzman N A, DeAngelis C
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Pediatr. 1991 Jan;118(1):125-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81865-7.
We tested the hypothesis that antihistamine-decongestant combinations cause no clinically significant relief of the symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in young children by randomly assigning 96 children to one of three treatment groups: antihistamine-decongestant, placebo, and no treatment. There were no differences among the three study groups in the proportion of children considered "better" overall by the parent 48 hours after the initial assessment (drug, 67%; placebo, 71%; no treatment, 57%; p = 0.53). There were no differences among groups in individual or composite symptom score changes. Two thirds of parents whose children were eligible for the drug trial believed that their child needed medicine for cold symptoms. In the proportion of parents believing that their child needed medicine, there was no difference between those who consented to participate and those who refused. Parents who wanted medicine at the initial visit reported more improvement at follow-up, regardless of whether the child received drug, placebo, or no treatment. We conclude that there is no clinically significant improvement in symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, including no significant placebo effect, in young children for whom an antihistamine-decongestant is prescribed.
我们通过将96名儿童随机分配到三个治疗组之一来检验这一假设,即抗组胺药 - 减充血剂组合对幼儿上呼吸道感染症状无临床显著缓解作用,这三个治疗组分别是:抗组胺药 - 减充血剂组、安慰剂组和不治疗组。在初始评估48小时后,家长认为总体“好转”的儿童比例在三个研究组之间没有差异(药物组为67%;安慰剂组为71%;不治疗组为57%;p = 0.53)。各组在个体或综合症状评分变化方面没有差异。三分之二符合药物试验条件的儿童的家长认为他们的孩子感冒症状需要用药。在认为孩子需要用药的家长比例方面,同意参与的家长和拒绝参与的家长之间没有差异。初次就诊时希望用药的家长在随访时报告孩子的改善情况更多,无论孩子接受的是药物、安慰剂还是未接受治疗。我们得出结论,对于开具了抗组胺药 - 减充血剂的幼儿,上呼吸道感染症状没有临床显著改善,包括没有显著的安慰剂效应。