Suppr超能文献

无张力阴道吊带术与无张力阴道吊带闭孔术治疗压力性尿失禁女性的比较

Tension-free vaginal tape versus tension-free vaginal tape obturator in women with stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Liapis Angelos, Bakas Panagiotis, Giner Maria, Creatsas Georgios

机构信息

2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieio Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(3):160-4. doi: 10.1159/000093320. Epub 2006 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy and complications of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) versus tension-free vaginal tape obturator in women with urodynamic stress incontinence.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized study. Initially, 91 patients were included in the study and 89 of them were available at 12 months follow-up. Forty-six patients were subjected to classic TVT procedure and 43 to transobturator vaginal tape from inside to outside (TVT-O) operation. There was no significant difference between the groups for age, BMI, menopausal status and prolapse. No patients had cystocele greater than stage I. Subjective and objective cure and improvement rate, mean operative time, hospital stay and complications incidence were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was significant shorter in the TVT-O group (17.4 +/- 6.9 min) compared to the TVT group (26.7 +/- 8.6 min). There was no significant difference in the duration of hospital stay between two groups. The objective cure rate for TVT group was 89%, the improvement rate was 6.5%, the failure rate was 4.3% and the subjective cure rate 73.9%. The objective cure rate for TVT-O group was 90%, the improvement rate was 7.6%, the failure rate was 2.5% and the subjective cure rate 76.7%. The hemoglobin loss ranged between 1.0 +/- 0.5 g/dl for TVT group and 0.9 +/- 0.4 g/dl for TVT-O group.

CONCLUSION

The TVT-O technique presents success rates comparable to the classic TVT method in the short term.

摘要

背景

评估无张力阴道吊带术(TVT)与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及并发症。

方法

前瞻性随机研究。最初纳入91例患者,其中89例在12个月随访时仍可获得。46例患者接受经典TVT手术,43例接受经闭孔阴道吊带术(TVT - O)。两组在年龄、体重指数、绝经状态和脱垂情况方面无显著差异。无患者膀胱膨出超过I期。评估主观及客观治愈率、改善率、平均手术时间、住院时间和并发症发生率。

结果

与TVT组(26.7±8.6分钟)相比,TVT - O组平均手术时间显著缩短(17.4±6.9分钟)。两组住院时间无显著差异。TVT组客观治愈率为89%,改善率为6.5%,失败率为4.3%,主观治愈率为73.9%。TVT - O组客观治愈率为90%,改善率为7.6%,失败率为2.5%,主观治愈率为76.7%。TVT组血红蛋白损失范围为1.0±0.5 g/dl,TVT - O组为0.9±0.4 g/dl。

结论

短期内,TVT - O技术的成功率与经典TVT方法相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验