Seay Melicia, Varma Priya
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2005 Dec 31:1-20.
The enactment of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA '90) gave states the option of offering pharmaceutical benefits within their Medicaid programs. But the law placed restrictions on states' flexibility to control what prescriptions they would cover and required the states to reimburse outpatient prescription drugs from manufacturers that signed rebate agreements with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Forty-nine states--Arizona is excluded, based on its program structure--and the District of Columbia currently offer prescription drug coverage under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. During the past four years, states all over the country have been plagued with revenue shortfalls in their state Medicaid budgets. While the fiscal situation improved for most states in the 2004 legislative session, many states still face budget pressures in 2005. Compounding existing budget pressures are threats from the Bush Administration to shift increased costs of the Medicaid program on to the states. All things considered, the economic pressure of funding Medicaid is at the top of legislative agendas in 2005. As in previous years, states are attempting to reduce costs to their Medicaid programs by seeking savings in their pharmaceutical programs. Prescription drug costs are highly attributed as a contributing factor to the fiscal climate of state Medicaid programs. Currently, prescription drug spending outpaces that of every other category of health care and drug prices are rising faster than inflation. In response, states are instituting a variety of pharmaceutical cost control measures such as creating preferred drug lists (PDLs), negotiating supplemental rebates, forming bulk purchasing pools, promoting generic drug substitution and implementing price controls. As prescription drug cost containment tools have gained acceptance and momentum, they continue to be controversial. This issue brief explores the debate, history, methodology, utilization and 2005 legislative activity surrounding the most commonly used and emerging pharmaceutical cost control measures.
1990年《综合预算协调法案》(《1990年预算法案》)的颁布,赋予了各州在其医疗补助计划中提供药品福利的选择权。但该法律对各州控制所涵盖处方的灵活性加以限制,并要求各州向与美国卫生与公众服务部签署回扣协议的药品制造商报销门诊处方药费用。除亚利桑那州(基于其计划结构)外,四十九个州以及哥伦比亚特区目前在医疗补助药品回扣计划下提供处方药覆盖范围。在过去四年中,全国各地的州医疗补助预算都面临着收入短缺问题。虽然在2004年立法会议期间,大多数州的财政状况有所改善,但许多州在2005年仍面临预算压力。布什政府将医疗补助计划增加的成本转嫁给各州的威胁,使现有的预算压力更加复杂。综合考虑,为医疗补助计划提供资金的经济压力在2005年的立法议程中处于首要位置。与往年一样,各州试图通过在药品计划中寻求节省开支来降低其医疗补助计划的成本。处方药成本被高度认为是导致州医疗补助计划财政状况的一个因素。目前,处方药支出超过了其他各类医疗保健支出,而且药品价格的上涨速度超过了通货膨胀率。作为回应,各州正在采取各种药品成本控制措施,如创建首选药品清单(PDL)、谈判补充回扣、组建批量采购池、推广非专利药品替代以及实施价格控制。随着处方药成本控制工具得到认可并形成势头,它们仍然存在争议。本问题简报探讨了围绕最常用和新兴的药品成本控制措施的争论、历史、方法、使用情况以及2005年的立法活动。