Kukkonen Tuuli M, Paterson Laurel, Binik Yitzchak M, Amsel Rhonda, Bouvier Francine, Khalifé Samir
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2006 Jul-Sep;32(4):281-7. doi: 10.1080/00926230600666220.
We examined the convergent and discriminant validity of clitoral ultrasonography as a measure of female sexual arousal by assessing the following: (a) its ability to discriminate between sexual and other forms of arousal; and (b) its correlation with subjective ratings of arousal. Results from 63 healthy premenopausal women indicate that ultrasonography was not successful in differentiating sexual arousal from a humor control condition. Furthermore, there were no significant correlations between clitoral blood-flow measures and subjective sexual arousal. Additional research is required to establish the specificity of ultrasonography as a measure of sexual arousal.
我们通过评估以下方面,检验了阴蒂超声检查作为女性性唤起测量方法的收敛效度和区分效度:(a) 其区分性唤起与其他形式唤起的能力;以及 (b) 其与性唤起主观评分的相关性。63名健康的绝经前女性的研究结果表明,超声检查未能成功区分性唤起与幽默对照条件下的唤起。此外,阴蒂血流测量与主观性唤起之间没有显著相关性。需要进一步的研究来确定超声检查作为性唤起测量方法的特异性。