Drew Richard
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Jun;27 Suppl 1:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.03.018. Epub 2006 May 19.
The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) continues to increase, largely due to the steady rise in the number of at-risk patients and the increased use of aggressive immunosuppressant agents. Many available treatments are often limited by concerns about efficacy, safety, drug interactions, and/or cost. Owing to the poor treatment outcomes of immunosuppressed patients with IFIs, new preventative and treatment strategies are being investigated. Among these are the aerosolized formulations of amphotericin B. Published experience with the use of aerosolized amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd) in the prevention of IFIs has raised concerns regarding challenges in drug administration and tolerability. However, evolving data regarding administration of lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B indicate potential advantages over AmBd in the prevention and adjunctive treatment of IFIs.
侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)的发病率持续上升,这主要归因于高危患者数量的稳步增加以及强效免疫抑制剂使用的增多。许多现有治疗方法常常受到疗效、安全性、药物相互作用和/或成本等问题的限制。由于免疫抑制患者发生IFI的治疗效果不佳,新的预防和治疗策略正在研究中。其中包括两性霉素B的雾化制剂。已发表的关于使用雾化两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐(AmBd)预防IFI的经验引发了对药物给药和耐受性方面挑战的担忧。然而,有关两性霉素B脂质体制剂给药的不断发展的数据表明,在IFI的预防和辅助治疗方面,其相对于AmBd具有潜在优势。