Oddo Mauro, Schaller Marie-Denise, Feihl François, Ribordy Vincent, Liaudet Lucas
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1865-73. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000221922.08878.49.
Therapeutic hypothermia has been recommended for postcardiac arrest coma due to ventricular fibrillation. However, no studies have evaluated whether therapeutic hypothermia could be effectively implemented in intensive care practice and whether it would improve the outcome of all comatose patients with cardiac arrest, including those with shock or with cardiac arrest due to nonventricular fibrillation rhythms.
Retrospective study.
Fourteen-bed medical intensive care unit in a university hospital.
Patients were 109 comatose patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation and nonventricular fibrillation rhythms (asystole/pulseless electrical activity).
We analyzed 55 consecutive patients (June 2002 to December 2004) treated with therapeutic hypothermia (to a central target temperature of 33 degrees C, using external cooling). Fifty-four consecutive patients (June 1999 to May 2002) treated with standard resuscitation served as controls. Efficacy, safety, and outcome at hospital discharge were assessed. Good outcome was defined as Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance category 1 or 2.
In patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, the median time to reach the target temperature was 5 hrs, with a progressive reduction over the 18 months of data collection. Therapeutic hypothermia had a major positive impact on the outcome of patients with cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (good outcome in 24 of 43 patients [55.8%] of the therapeutic hypothermia group vs. 11 of 43 patients [25.6%] of the standard resuscitation group, p = .004). The benefit of therapeutic hypothermia was also maintained in patients with shock (good outcome in five of 17 patients of the therapeutic hypothermia group vs. zero of 14 of the standard resuscitation group, p = .027). The outcome after cardiac arrest due to nonventricular fibrillation rhythms was poor and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Therapeutic hypothermia was of particular benefit in patients with short duration of cardiac arrest (<30 mins).
Therapeutic hypothermia for the treatment of postcardiac arrest coma can be successfully implemented in intensive care practice with a major benefit on patient outcome, which appeared to be related to the type and the duration of initial cardiac arrest and seemed maintained in patients with shock.
对于因室颤导致的心搏骤停后昏迷患者,推荐采用治疗性低温治疗。然而,尚无研究评估治疗性低温治疗能否在重症监护实践中有效实施,以及它是否能改善所有心搏骤停昏迷患者的预后,包括那些伴有休克或因非室颤节律导致心搏骤停的患者。
回顾性研究。
一所大学医院的拥有14张床位的医疗重症监护病房。
109例院外心搏骤停昏迷患者,病因包括室颤和非室颤节律(心脏停搏/无脉电活动)。
我们分析了连续55例接受治疗性低温治疗的患者(2002年6月至2004年12月)(采用外部降温使中心目标温度降至33摄氏度)。连续54例接受标准复苏治疗的患者(1999年6月至2002年5月)作为对照。评估出院时的疗效、安全性和预后。良好预后定义为格拉斯哥-匹兹堡脑功能分级为1级或2级。
在接受治疗性低温治疗的患者中,达到目标温度的中位时间为5小时,在18个月的数据收集期间逐渐缩短。治疗性低温治疗对因室颤导致的心搏骤停患者的预后有重大积极影响(治疗性低温治疗组43例患者中有24例[55.8%]预后良好,而标准复苏组43例患者中有11例[25.6%]预后良好,p = 0.004)。治疗性低温治疗对伴有休克的患者也有疗效(治疗性低温治疗组17例患者中有5例预后良好,而标准复苏组14例患者中无一例预后良好,p = 0.027)。因非室颤节律导致的心搏骤停患者预后较差,两组之间无显著差异。治疗性低温治疗对心搏骤停持续时间短(<30分钟)的患者特别有益。
治疗性低温治疗心搏骤停后昏迷在重症监护实践中可以成功实施,对患者预后有重大益处,这似乎与初始心搏骤停的类型和持续时间有关,且在伴有休克的患者中似乎也能维持疗效。