Yagci Gokhan, Unlu Aytekin, Kurt Bulent, Can Mehmet Fatih, Kaymakcioglu Nihat, Cetiner Sadettin, Tufan Turgut, Sen Dervis
Department of Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018 Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Feb;22(2):167-73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0132-7. Epub 2006 May 24.
The debate over sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and focused pathologic examination to detect micrometastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) continues. We present in this paper our experience with SLNM for CRCs to improve staging. In addition, we have detailed the mapping procedure on an anatomical basis to define skip metastasis.
Forty-seven patients underwent ex vivo SLNM. Immediately after resection, 1 ml of patent blue VF was injected submucosally around the tumor. Lymph nodes harvested from the first 15 patients were mapped in a standard fashion as the blue-stained nodes (SLNs), and the others (non-SLNs) were dissected away. In the remaining 32 patients, the lymph nodes were also mapped separately in relation to their anatomic location and described as epicolic-paracolic, intermediate, and principal. The blue-stained nodes (SLNs) and non-SLNs, negative by hematoxylin and eosin stain, were further stained with cytokeratin immunohistochemical analysis and carcinoembryonic antigen.
A total of 873 histologically confirmed LNs were examined with a mean of 18.6+/-8.1 nodes per patient. In 46 of 47 patients (97.8%), SLNs were identified. Immunohistochemical staining revealed micrometastases in the lymph nodes of four patients, which were negative by conventional methods. Anatomical skip metastases were noted in 4 of 32 patients studied (12.5%).
Ex vivo SLNM in CRCs is a feasible technique with a high SLN identification rate. Results of anatomical mapping of lymph nodes correlates with the limited literature, suggesting that occult skip metastases can occur in the apical lymph node group and may occur outside the resected area.
关于前哨淋巴结定位(SLNM)及通过聚焦病理检查来检测结直肠癌(CRC)患者微转移的争论仍在继续。我们在本文中介绍了我们应用SLNM对CRC进行分期的经验。此外,我们还详细阐述了基于解剖学的定位程序以确定跳跃转移。
47例患者接受了体外SLNM。切除后立即在肿瘤周围黏膜下注射1ml专利蓝VF。对前15例患者切除的淋巴结以标准方式标记为蓝色染色淋巴结(SLN),其余(非SLN)则予以切除。在其余32例患者中,淋巴结也根据其解剖位置分别标记,并描述为结肠旁、中间和主要淋巴结。苏木精和伊红染色阴性的蓝色染色淋巴结(SLN)和非SLN,进一步进行细胞角蛋白免疫组化分析和癌胚抗原染色。
共检查了873个经组织学证实的淋巴结,平均每位患者18.6±8.1个淋巴结。47例患者中有46例(97.8%)识别出了SLN。免疫组化染色显示4例患者的淋巴结存在微转移,而这些淋巴结用传统方法检查为阴性。在32例研究患者中有4例(12.5%)发现了解剖学上的跳跃转移。
CRC的体外SLNM是一种可行的技术,SLN识别率高。淋巴结的解剖定位结果与有限的文献报道相符,提示隐匿性跳跃转移可能发生在顶端淋巴结组,也可能发生在切除区域之外。