Kebbel Anja, Röcken Christoph
Department of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, and Department of Pathology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Jun;30(6):673-83. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200606000-00002.
We aimed to reassess the suitability of immunohistochemical classification of amyloid in surgical pathology. One hundred sixty-nine biopsies from 121 patients diagnosed with amyloid during the period from 1994 to 2004 were included. Amyloid was classified immunohistochemically, using antibodies directed against amyloid P-component, AA amyloid, apolipoprotein AI, fibrinogen, keratoepithelin, lactoferrin, lysozyme, beta2-microglobulin (beta2M), immunoglobulin-derived lambda-light and kappa-light chains, and transthyretin. Amyloid was most commonly present in biopsies from the hepatogastrointestinal tract. The deposits were classified immunohistochemically in 156 (92%) biopsies. In 13 biopsies of 12 patients, amyloid remained unclassified. AL amyloidosis was diagnosed in 76 (45%) biopsies and was further categorized into AL amyloid of kappa-light chain origin [32 (42%) biopsies] or lambda-light chain origin [20 (26%)]. In 24 (32%) biopsies, the amyloid deposits did not show unequivocal staining for lambda-light or kappa-light chain. However, these cases were categorized as "probably AL amyloid, not otherwise specified", because no other antibody showed unequivocal staining of the amyloid deposits. AA amyloidosis was diagnosed in 32, ATTR amyloidosis in 21, and AApoAI amyloidosis in 3 biopsies. Other types of amyloid included AKer and ALac amyloids each in 1, and ALys and ACal amyloids each in 2 biopsies. Abeta2M amyloid was not diagnosed in any case. Immunohistochemical classification of amyloid still poses problems. Although classification of AA, AApoAI, ALys, ALac, and ATTR amyloids is relatively straightforward, classification of AL amyloid and rare hereditary amyloidoses is a serious obstacle and sometimes even impossible when conclusive clinical information or additional protein biochemical or molecular biologic studies are not available.
我们旨在重新评估免疫组织化学分类法在外科病理学中对淀粉样变的适用性。纳入了1994年至2004年期间121例被诊断为淀粉样变患者的169份活检样本。使用针对淀粉样P成分、AA淀粉样蛋白、载脂蛋白AI、纤维蛋白原、角蛋白上皮素、乳铁蛋白、溶菌酶、β2微球蛋白(β2M)、免疫球蛋白衍生的λ轻链和κ轻链以及转甲状腺素蛋白的抗体,对淀粉样变进行免疫组织化学分类。淀粉样变最常见于肝胃肠道的活检样本中。156份(92%)活检样本的沉积物通过免疫组织化学进行了分类。在12例患者的13份活检样本中,淀粉样变仍未分类。76份(45%)活检样本诊断为AL淀粉样变性,并进一步分为κ轻链型AL淀粉样变[32份(42%)活检样本]或λ轻链型[20份(26%)]。在24份(32%)活检样本中,淀粉样沉积物未显示出λ轻链或κ轻链的明确染色。然而,这些病例被归类为“可能为未另行指定的AL淀粉样变”,因为没有其他抗体显示淀粉样沉积物有明确染色。32份活检样本诊断为AA淀粉样变性,21份诊断为ATTR淀粉样变性,3份活检样本诊断为AApoAI淀粉样变性。其他类型的淀粉样变包括AKer和ALac淀粉样变各1例,ALys和ACal淀粉样变各2例。未诊断出任何Abeta2M淀粉样变病例。淀粉样变的免疫组织化学分类仍然存在问题。尽管AA、AApoAI、ALys、ALac和ATTR淀粉样变的分类相对简单,但当没有确凿的临床信息或额外的蛋白质生化或分子生物学研究时,AL淀粉样变和罕见遗传性淀粉样变的分类是一个严重障碍,有时甚至无法进行。