• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过敏症专科医生办公室中预先授权相关的经济负担。

The economic burden associated with prior authorizations in an allergist office.

作者信息

Bukstein Don A, Cherayil Greeta A, Gepner Adam D, Luskin Allan T, Kooistra J Brent, Olson Reid M

机构信息

Department of Allergy, Dean Medical Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53715, USA.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2006 Mar-Apr;27(2):119-22.

PMID:16724629
Abstract

Costs for managed care organizations to process prior authorizations (PAs) for nonformulary medications have been estimated to be dollars 20-25 per request. Costs for physicians to process these requests have not been studied extensively. A data collection tool was developed and used by physicians and nurses to document time spent on processing PAs. Data were collected over 8 weeks and 117 requests were processed. Nurses averaged 5.6 +/- 6.5 calls per day per nurse and spent an average of 17 minutes per call. Physicians averaged 1.9 +/- 1.2 calls per day averaging 5.8 +/- 5.0 minutes per call. During the study period nurses spent >40 hours on 231 calls and physicians spent >8 hours on 154 calls. Based on the hourly rate of the nurses and physicians, the total cost in this specialty practice was dollars 17.77 per PA. Of the 117 PA requests, 98.7% were approved the first time they were processed. There are substantial costs with processing PAs for nonformulary drugs on the physician office side of managed care as well as on the insurance side of the process. Specialty physicians should have a different process for obtaining notformulary medications because almost 100% of their requests are granted.

摘要

据估计,管理式医疗组织处理非处方药物预先授权(PA)的成本为每份申请20至25美元。医生处理这些申请的成本尚未得到广泛研究。开发了一种数据收集工具,供医生和护士用来记录处理预先授权所花费的时间。在8周内收集了数据,共处理了117份申请。护士平均每人每天拨打5.6±6.5个电话,每次通话平均花费17分钟。医生平均每人每天拨打1.9±1.2个电话,每次通话平均花费5.8±5.0分钟。在研究期间,护士在231次通话上花费了超过40小时,医生在154次通话上花费了超过8小时。根据护士和医生的小时费率,该专科诊所处理每份预先授权的总成本为17.77美元。在117份预先授权申请中,98.7%在首次处理时获得批准。在管理式医疗的医生办公室方面以及保险流程方面,处理非处方药物的预先授权都存在大量成本。专科医生在获取非处方药物时应有不同的流程,因为他们几乎100%的申请都会获批。

相似文献

1
The economic burden associated with prior authorizations in an allergist office.过敏症专科医生办公室中预先授权相关的经济负担。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2006 Mar-Apr;27(2):119-22.
2
Prior authorization of newer insomnia medications in managed care: is it cost saving?管理式医疗中新型失眠药物的预先授权:它能节省成本吗?
J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Jun 15;3(4):393-8.
3
Managed care cost containment involving prescription drugs. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.
Food Drug Law J. 1998;53(1):25-34.
4
Evaluating the nondrug costs of formulary coverage restrictions.
Manag Care. 2005 Aug;14(8):50-7, 62.
5
Escalating need for comparative analysis of drugs within a therapeutic class.对治疗类别内药物进行比较分析的需求不断增加。
Manag Care Interface. 2003 Oct;16(10):32-4.
6
Impact of an annual dollar limit or "cap" on prescription drug benefits for Medicare patients.年度美元限额或“上限”对医疗保险患者处方药福利的影响。
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):222-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.222.
7
Physician satisfaction with formulary policies: is it access to formulary or nonformulary drugs that matters most?医生对处方集政策的满意度:最重要的是获得处方集内药物还是非处方集药物?
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Mar;10(3):209-16.
8
Pharmaceuticals issue brief: managed care drug formularies: year end report-2003.药品问题简报:管理式医疗药品处方集:2003年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2003 Dec 31:1-8.
9
Cost not the primary factor driving drug coverage.
Capitation Rates Data. 2000 May;5(5):51-3.
10
Managing prescription drug costs.管理处方药成本。
Empl Benefits J. 2001 Mar;26(1):35-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice characteristics and prior authorization costs: secondary analysis of data collected by SALT-Net in 9 central New York primary care practices.执业特征与预先授权成本:对纽约州中部9家初级保健机构通过SALT-Net收集的数据进行的二次分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 6;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-109.
2
Systematic review on quality control for drug management programs: is quality reported in the literature?药物管理项目质量控制的系统评价:文献中是否报道了质量情况?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 25;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-38.
3
Which physicians are affected most by Medicaid preferred drug lists for statins and antihypertensives?
哪些医生受他汀类药物和抗高血压药物的医疗补助优选药物清单影响最大?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24 Suppl 3:27-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624003-00003.