• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Dissolution and relative bioavailability of two carbamazepine preparations for children with epilepsy.

作者信息

Hartley R, Aleksandrowicz J, Bowmer C J, Cawood A, Forsythe W I

机构信息

Paediatric Research Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991 Feb;43(2):117-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb06644.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb06644.x
PMID:1672895
Abstract

The in-vitro dissolution profiles of two carbamazepine formulations (Tegretol and a generic carbamazepine) have been assessed and the bioavailability of carbamazepine compared in 12 epileptic children at steady-state. Dissolution from the generic formulation (100 and 200 mg tablets) tended to be greater than for the proprietary tablets. However, the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine when assessed at steady-state were similar for the two formulations. It appears, therefore, that the breakthrough seizures and higher incidence of neurological side-effects observed when children were given generic carbamazepine in place of the proprietary formulation cannot be accounted for by differences in bioavailability or pharmacokinetics.

摘要

相似文献

1
Dissolution and relative bioavailability of two carbamazepine preparations for children with epilepsy.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991 Feb;43(2):117-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb06644.x.
2
Comparative study of bioavailability and clinical efficacy of carbamazepine in epileptic patients.卡马西平在癫痫患者中的生物利用度与临床疗效的对比研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 May;31(5):548-52. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100504.
3
Breakthrough seizures with generic carbamazepine: a consequence of poorer bioavailability?普通卡马西平引发的突破性癫痫发作:生物利用度较低的后果?
Br J Clin Pract. 1990 Jul;44(7):270-3.
4
Comparative bioavailability and steady state fluctuations of Tegretol commercial and carbamazepine OROS tablets in adult and pediatric epileptic patients.卡马西平市售制剂与卡马西平渗透泵控释片在成人及儿童癫痫患者中的生物利用度比较及稳态波动情况
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1992 Nov;13(8):559-69. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510130802.
5
A comparative pharmacokinetic study of conventional and chewable carbamazepine in epileptic patients.癫痫患者中常规剂型与咀嚼片型卡马西平的比较药代动力学研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 May;29(5):574-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03682.x.
6
A comparative bioavailability of four Carbamazepine tablet formulations available in the Kenyan market.肯尼亚市场上四种卡马西平片剂制剂的相对生物利用度。
East Afr Med J. 1996 May;73(5):323-6.
7
Bioavailability of two carbamazepine preparations during chronic administration to epileptic patients.两种卡马西平制剂在癫痫患者长期给药期间的生物利用度。
Epilepsia. 1975 Dec;16(5):759-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1975.tb04762.x.
8
[Evaluation of the biological availability of 2 carbamazepine preparations].[两种卡马西平制剂的生物利用度评价]
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1986 Sep-Oct;20(5):415-20.
9
Comparison of absorption rate and bioavailability of two brands of carbamazepine.两种品牌卡马西平的吸收率和生物利用度比较。
J Assoc Physicians India. 1999 Jul;47(7):699-702.
10
Therapeutic bioequivalency study of brand name versus generic carbamazepine.品牌名卡马西平与仿制药的治疗生物等效性研究。
Neurology. 1992 Jun;42(6):1147-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.6.1147.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Mechanistic Modeling Approaches to Support Bioequivalence Assessments for Oral Products.利用机制建模方法支持口服产品的生物等效性评估。
AAPS J. 2024 Jan 24;26(1):19. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00886-x.
2
IVIVC Revised.IVIVC 修订版。
Pharm Res. 2024 Feb;41(2):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s11095-024-03653-x. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Integration of Biorelevant Pediatric Dissolution Methodology into PBPK Modeling to Predict In Vivo Performance and Bioequivalence of Generic Drugs in Pediatric Populations: a Carbamazepine Case Study.
将生物相关儿科溶出度方法学整合到 PBPK 建模中,以预测儿科人群中仿制药的体内性能和生物等效性:卡马西平案例研究。
AAPS J. 2023 Jun 29;25(4):67. doi: 10.1208/s12248-023-00826-1.
4
Therapeutic Basis of Generic Substitution of Antiseizure Medications.抗癫痫药物通用名替换的治疗基础。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2022 May;381(2):188-196. doi: 10.1124/jpet.121.000994. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
Study of In Vitro and In Vivo Carbamazepine Release from Coarse and Nanometric Pharmaceutical Emulsions Obtained via Ultra-High-Pressure Homogenization.通过超高压均质法获得的粗粒和纳米级药物乳液中卡马西平的体外和体内释放研究。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Mar 26;13(4):53. doi: 10.3390/ph13040053.
6
Potential problems and recommendations regarding substitution of generic antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of literature.关于通用型抗癫痫药物替代的潜在问题与建议:文献系统综述
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 25;5:182. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1824-2. eCollection 2016.
7
Impact of generic substitution of anticonvulsants on the treatment of epilepsy.抗癫痫药物仿制药替代对癫痫治疗的影响。
CNS Drugs. 1997 Aug;8(2):124-33. doi: 10.2165/00023210-199708020-00004.
8
Switching from brand-name to generic psychotropic medications: a literature review.从品牌名药物转换为通用精神类药物:文献综述。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2011 Dec;17(6):750-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00210.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
9
Seizure outcomes following the use of generic versus brand-name antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用通用名与品牌名抗癫痫药物的癫痫发作结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2010 Mar 26;70(5):605-21. doi: 10.2165/10898530-000000000-00000.
10
Is generic prescribing acceptable in epilepsy?在癫痫治疗中使用通用名药物处方是否可接受?
Drug Saf. 2000 Sep;23(3):173-82. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200023030-00001.