Suppr超能文献

一项针对局部晚期直肠癌患者进行的术前加速超分割盆腔照射联合或不联合低剂量术前预防性肝脏照射的前瞻性研究。

A pilot study of accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation with or without low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

作者信息

Suwinski Rafal, Wydmanski Jerzy, Pawełczyk Iwona, Starzewski Jacek

机构信息

Centre of Oncology, Maria-Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Branch Gliwice, Poland.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jul;80(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation (PLI) combined with preoperative accelerated hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation (HART) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2003 62 patients were enrolled: 38 (61%) received HART and 24 (39%) HART+PLI. The pelvis was irradiated twice a day, with a minimal interfraction interval of 6h: the total dose of 42 Gy was given in 1.5 Gy per fractions over 18 days. The PLI (14 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 1.4 Gy) was given simultaneously with the morning fraction of HART. Twenty patients (32%), including 7 in PLI group, received 5-Fu based postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In general, acute normal tissue reactions appeared tolerable irrespectively of PLI. Six to twelve months after completion of combined therapy the mean ALAT levels in patients treated with HART alone (25 pts), HART+chemotherapy (13 pts), HART+PLI (17 pts), and HART+PLI+chemotherapy (7 pts) were 15, 21, 26 and 55 IU/l, respectively. A mild increase of ALAT levels observed in the HART+PLI+chemotherapy sub-group was non-symptomatic. Three-year actuarial loco-regional control rate in a group of 62 patients was 94%. None of the patients who received PLI developed metastases during the follow-up, compared to 10 out of 38 patients (26%) with no PLI. A difference in metastases-free survival in favor of HART+PLI can be, however, attributed to selection of patients for PLI who were in better general health and stage of disease than those treated with HART.

CONCLUSIONS

Further use of PLI may be limited due to asymptomatic, but detectable biochemical changes of liver function when PLI is sequentially combined with chemotherapy. HART, on the other hand, provides acceptable rate of local control, and is well tolerated, also when combined with postoperative chemotherapy.

摘要

背景与目的

评估低剂量术前预防性肝脏照射(PLI)联合术前加速超分割盆腔照射(HART)用于局部晚期直肠癌患者的可行性。

患者与方法

1999年至2003年期间共纳入62例患者:38例(61%)接受HART,24例(39%)接受HART+PLI。盆腔每天照射两次,两次照射间隔至少6小时:总剂量42 Gy,分18天给予,每次1.5 Gy。PLI(14 Gy,分10次,每次1.4 Gy,每日一次)与HART的上午照射同时进行。20例患者(32%),包括PLI组中的7例,接受了基于5-氟尿嘧啶的术后化疗。

结果

总体而言,无论是否接受PLI,急性正常组织反应均可耐受。联合治疗完成后6至12个月,单纯接受HART治疗的患者(25例)、接受HART+化疗的患者(13例)、接受HART+PLI的患者(17例)以及接受HART+PLI+化疗的患者(7例)的平均谷丙转氨酶(ALAT)水平分别为15、21、26和55 IU/L。在HART+PLI+化疗亚组中观察到的ALAT水平轻度升高无症状。62例患者的三年精算局部区域控制率为94%。接受PLI的患者在随访期间均未发生转移,而未接受PLI的38例患者中有10例(26%)发生转移。然而,HART+PLI组无转移生存期的差异可能归因于接受PLI的患者在总体健康状况和疾病分期方面优于接受HART治疗的患者。

结论

当PLI与化疗序贯联合时,由于肝功能出现无症状但可检测到的生化变化,PLI的进一步应用可能受到限制。另一方面,HART可提供可接受的局部控制率,并且在与术后化疗联合时耐受性良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验