Suppr超能文献

圣犹达Silzone心脏瓣膜的时间相关风险。

Time-related risk of the St. Jude Silzone heart valve.

作者信息

Grunkemeier Gary L, Jin Ruyun, Im Kyungah, Holubkov Richard, Kennard Elizabeth D, Schaff Hartzell V

机构信息

Medical Data Research Center, Providence Health System, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jul;30(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.04.012. Epub 2006 May 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The St. Jude Medical Silzone heart valve had a silver-impregnated sewing ring designed to reduce the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Recruitment to the randomized AVERT study comparing Silzone valves with non-Silzone Control valves was stopped because of an increased risk of reoperation for paravalvular leak, but patient follow-up continues. Determining the time-related risk profile of the Silzone valve is important for helping physicians manage the approximately 28,000 patients currently alive with a Silzone valve.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2000, 403 Silzone and 404 Control patients were enrolled in AVERT. As of July 2005, there were 1819 Silzone and 1842 Control patient-years of follow-up (mean 4.5, median 5.1 years). Analysis emphasized the use and interpretation of hazard functions, since they are more meaningful than event-free percentages to currently surviving patients. To this end, instead of Cox regression, which estimates the hazard ratio, assuming it is constant over time, we employed primarily Aalen additive regression, which measures the hazard difference, and produces a plot of it over time. We assessed the risks of major paravalvular leak, endocarditis, bleeding and thrombo-embolism.

RESULTS

The Silzone valve had a higher initial risk of major paravalvular leak than Control in the mitral (p=0.02) position, but not in the aortic (p=0.42) position. Analysis of this risk using additive regression, with all valve positions combined, showed that the initial risk due to Silzone lost statistical significance by 2 years and disappeared by 4 years after implant. In the mitral position, the Silzone valve had a higher initial risk of thrombo-embolism plus bleeding than Control; this risk also lost statistical significance by 2 years and subsided to zero by 4 years. The risks for death and endocarditis were similar for Slizone and Control valves.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional risks of the Silzone valve, compared to Control, diminish over time and disappear by 4 years after implant. The minimum time after implant of the patients currently alive with Silzone is now well beyond 5 years; thus, these current patients now have a risk profile similar to that of patients with a standard St. Jude valve.

摘要

目的

圣犹达医疗公司的Silzone心脏瓣膜有一个含银的缝合环,旨在降低人工瓣膜心内膜炎的发生率。比较Silzone瓣膜与非Silzone对照瓣膜的随机AVERT研究因瓣周漏再次手术风险增加而停止招募,但患者随访仍在继续。确定Silzone瓣膜与时间相关的风险概况对于帮助医生管理目前存活的约28000名使用Silzone瓣膜的患者很重要。

方法

1998年至2000年期间,403名使用Silzone瓣膜的患者和404名对照患者被纳入AVERT研究。截至2005年7月,有1819名使用Silzone瓣膜的患者和1842名对照患者年的随访数据(平均4.5年,中位数5.1年)。分析重点在于风险函数的使用和解读,因为对于目前存活的患者而言,风险函数比无事件百分比更有意义。为此,我们主要采用阿alen加法回归,而非估计风险比且假设其随时间恒定的Cox回归,阿alen加法回归测量风险差异,并绘制其随时间变化的曲线。我们评估了严重瓣周漏、心内膜炎、出血和血栓栓塞的风险。

结果

在二尖瓣(p = 0.02)位置,Silzone瓣膜的严重瓣周漏初始风险高于对照瓣膜,但在主动脉瓣(p = 0.42)位置则不然。对所有瓣膜位置综合进行加法回归分析该风险,结果显示,Silzone瓣膜导致的初始风险在植入后2年失去统计学意义,4年后消失。在二尖瓣位置,Silzone瓣膜的血栓栓塞加出血初始风险高于对照瓣膜;该风险在植入后2年也失去统计学意义,4年后降至零。Silzone瓣膜和对照瓣膜的死亡和心内膜炎风险相似。

结论

与对照瓣膜相比,Silzone瓣膜的额外风险会随时间降低,植入后4年消失。目前存活的使用Silzone瓣膜患者的植入后最短时间现在已远超5年;因此,这些现有的患者目前的风险概况与使用标准圣犹达瓣膜的患者相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验