• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索利那新治疗老年膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和耐受性:一项汇总分析。

Efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin in elderly subjects with overactive bladder syndrome: a pooled analysis.

作者信息

Wagg Adrian, Wyndaele Jean-Jacque, Sieber Paul

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Free and University College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;4(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.03.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.03.004
PMID:16730617
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is characterized by urinary frequency and urgency with or without urge incontinence, and often accompanied by nocturia. The prevalence of OAB increases with aging; it is a particularly common condition among the elderly, affecting at least 25% of people aged > or = 65 years.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily for treating elderly subjects with OAB.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of pooled data from 4 studies. Data were analyzed from elderly subjects (aged > or = 65 years) with OAB who were treated with solifenacin in four 12-week, double-blind, Phase III, international, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled studies and from elderly subjects who received solifenacin in a 40-week, open-label, flexible-dose extension trial that enrolled subjects who completed 2 of the double-blind studies. Micturition data were collected from diaries completed during the 3 days before each study visit. Efficacy end points included mean change from baseline for the number of incontinence episodes/24 hours, urgency episodes/24 hours, number of micturitions/24 hours, and volume voided/micturition. The proportion of subjects who became continent or had no urgency episodes at end point was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects in the 12-week, double-blind studies (N = 1045; 781 women, 264 men) was 71.9 years; mean age in the 40-week extension trial (N = 509; 359 women, 150 men) was 71.2 years. The majority of subjects (74.7% in the 12-week, double-blind studies and 70.5% in the 40-week extension trial) were female, and >90% of the elderly subjects were white. The duration of OAB ranged from 0 to 66 months, and 43.7% had received previous medical therapy for OAB. The completion rate for elderly subjects was 85.5% for the 12-week, double-blind studies and 80.0% for the 40-week extension trial. Efficacy end points at week 12 of double-blind treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the symptoms of OAB with solifenacin compared with placebo. Mean (SE) changes in number of incontinence episodes/24 hours were -1.5 (0.17) for the 5-mg dose and -1.9 (0.14) for the 10-mg dose compared with -1.0 (0.14) for placebo (P = 0.013 for the 5-mg dose and P < 0.001 for the 10-mg dose, vs placebo); mean (SE) changes in the number of urgency episodes/24 hours were -3.2 (0.27) for the 5-mg dose and -3.2 (0.19) for the 10-mg dose compared with -1.6 (0.18) for placebo (P < 0.001 for both doses vs placebo); mean (SE) changes in the number of micturitions/24 hours were -2.0 (0.17) for the 5-mg dose and -2.5 (0.13) for the 10-mg dose compared with -1.1 (0.13) for placebo (P < 0.001 for both doses vs placebo); mean (SE) changes in the volume voided/micturition were 30.2 (3.24) mL for the 5-mg dose and 46.2 (2.55) mL for the 10-mg dose, compared with 9.1 (2.39) mL for placebo (P < 0.001 for both doses vs placebo). The proportion of subjects with restoration of continence was 49.1% and 47.3% of the 5- and 10-mg treatment groups, respectively, compared with 28.9% of the placebo group (P < 0.001 for both doses vs placebo). The proportion of subjects with resolution of urgency was 34.6% and 24.9% for the 5- and 10-mg treatment groups, respectively, compared with 16.9% of the placebo group (P < 0.001 for the 5-mg dose and P < 0.01 for the 10-mg dose). Improvements in incontinence, urgency, and micturitions were maintained during the 40-week extension trial. The most common adverse events in both the double-blind and extension trials were dry mouth, constipation, and urinary tract infection. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in nature and did not result in treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In these pooled analyses, solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily were efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of these elderly subjects with OAB. Solifenacin therapy was also associated with a high level of persistence in a 40-week extension trial.

摘要

背景

膀胱过度活动症(OAB)综合征的特征是尿频、尿急,伴或不伴有急迫性尿失禁,且常伴有夜尿症。OAB的患病率随年龄增长而增加;在老年人中这是一种特别常见的病症,至少影响25%年龄≥65岁的人群。

目的

本研究的目的是评估每日一次服用5毫克和10毫克索利那新治疗老年OAB患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

这是一项对4项研究汇总数据的回顾性分析。分析了来自4项为期12周、双盲、III期、国际、多中心、随机、平行组、固定剂量、安慰剂对照研究中接受索利那新治疗的老年(年龄≥65岁)OAB患者的数据,以及来自一项为期4周、开放标签、灵活剂量延长期试验中接受索利那新治疗的老年患者的数据,该延长期试验纳入了完成2项双盲研究的受试者。排尿数据从每次研究访视前3天完成的日记中收集。疗效终点包括与基线相比,每24小时尿失禁发作次数、尿急发作次数、排尿次数以及每次排尿量的平均变化。还评估了在终点时实现控尿或无尿急发作的受试者比例。

结果

12周双盲研究中受试者的平均年龄(N = 1045;781名女性,264名男性)为71.9岁;40周延长期试验中受试者的平均年龄(N = 509;359名女性,150名男性)为71.2岁。大多数受试者(12周双盲研究中为74.7%,40周延长期试验中为70.5%)为女性,超过90%的老年受试者为白人。OAB的病程为0至66个月,43.7%的患者曾接受过OAB的药物治疗。12周双盲研究中老年受试者的完成率为85.5%,40周延长期试验为80.0%。双盲治疗第12周时的疗效终点显示,与安慰剂相比,索利那新在改善OAB症状方面具有统计学意义。与安慰剂相比,5毫克剂量组每24小时尿失禁发作次数的平均(SE)变化为-1.5(0.17),10毫克剂量组为-1.9(0.14),而安慰剂组为-1.0(0.14)(5毫克剂量组与安慰剂相比P = 0.013,10毫克剂量组P < 0.001);5毫克剂量组每24小时尿急发作次数的平均(SE)变化为-3.2(0.27),10毫克剂量组为-3.2(0.19),而安慰剂组为-1.6(0.18)(两个剂量组与安慰剂相比P均< 0.001);5毫克剂量组每24小时排尿次数的平均(SE)变化为-2.0(0.17),10毫克剂量组为-2.5(0.13),而安慰剂组为-1.1(0.13)(两个剂量组与安慰剂相比P均< 0.001);5毫克剂量组每次排尿量的平均(SE)变化为30.2(3.24)毫升,10毫克剂量组为46.2(2.55)毫升,而安慰剂组为9.1(2.39)毫升(两个剂量组与安慰剂相比P均< 0.001)。5毫克和10毫克治疗组控尿恢复的受试者比例分别为49.1%和47.3%,而安慰剂组为28.9%(两个剂量组与安慰剂相比P均< 0.001)。5毫克和10毫克治疗组尿急缓解的受试者比例分别为34.6%和24.9%,而安慰剂组为16.9%(5毫克剂量组P < 0.001,10毫克剂量组P < 0.01)。在40周延长期试验中,尿失禁、尿急和排尿情况的改善得以维持。双盲试验和延长期试验中最常见的不良事件是口干、便秘和尿路感染。大多数不良事件为轻至中度,未导致治疗中断。

结论

在这些汇总分析中,每日一次服用5毫克和10毫克索利那新治疗这些老年OAB患者有效且耐受性良好。在40周延长期试验中,索利那新治疗的持续性也很高。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin in elderly subjects with overactive bladder syndrome: a pooled analysis.索利那新治疗老年膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和耐受性:一项汇总分析。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;4(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.03.004.
2
Efficacy of solifenacin in patients with severe symptoms of overactive bladder: a pooled analysis.索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症严重症状患者的疗效:一项汇总分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jan;22(1):41-8. doi: 10.1185/030079905X74907.
3
Randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial of the once daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin succinate in patients with overactive bladder.琥珀酸索利那新每日一次治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140729.07840.16.
4
Efficacy of solifenacin in patients previously treated with tolterodine extended release 4 mg: results of a 12-week, multicenter, open-label, flexible-dose study.索利那新在曾接受4毫克托特罗定缓释制剂治疗的患者中的疗效:一项为期12周的多中心、开放标签、灵活剂量研究的结果。
Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1766-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.011.
5
Recent developments in the management of overactive bladder: focus on the efficacy and tolerability of once daily solifenacin succinate 5 mg.膀胱过度活动症管理的最新进展:聚焦于每日一次服用5毫克琥珀酸索利那新的疗效和耐受性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jan;21(1):71-80. doi: 10.1185/030079904x20268.
6
Randomized, double-blind placebo- and tolterodine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in patients with symptomatic overactive bladder.每日一次抗毒蕈碱药物索利那新治疗症状性膀胱过度活动症患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂及托特罗定对照试验
BJU Int. 2004 Feb;93(3):303-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04606.x.
7
Efficacy and safety of combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin compared with monotherapy and placebo in patients with overactive bladder (SYNERGY study).米拉贝隆与索利那新联合用药对比单药治疗及安慰剂治疗对膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和安全性(协同研究)
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):562-575. doi: 10.1111/bju.13882. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Randomized, double-blind, placebo- and propiverine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder.在日本膀胱过度活动症患者中进行的每日一次抗毒蕈碱药物索利那新的随机、双盲、安慰剂和丙哌维林对照试验。
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):579-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07031.x.
9
Solifenacin is effective for the treatment of OAB dry patients: a pooled analysis.索利那新对膀胱过度活动症干性患者有效:一项汇总分析。
Eur Urol. 2005 Sep;48(3):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.007.
10
Long-term open-label solifenacin treatment associated with persistence with therapy in patients with overactive bladder syndrome.长期开放标签索利那新治疗与膀胱过度活动症患者的治疗持续性相关。
Eur Urol. 2005 Mar;47(3):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.11.004. Epub 2005 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-induced xerostomia and hyposalivation in patients with overactive bladder: a prospective open-label observational study comparing antimuscarinics and β3-adrenoceptor agonists.膀胱过度活动症患者的药物性口干和唾液分泌减少:一项比较抗毒蕈碱药物和β3肾上腺素能受体激动剂的前瞻性开放标签观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09720-6.
2
Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults.口服抗胆碱能药物与安慰剂或不治疗成人膀胱过度活动症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.
3
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Treatments for Overactive Bladder Among Older Adults: A Network Meta-analysis.
老年人膀胱过度活动症治疗方法的比较安全性和疗效:网络荟萃分析。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Nov;37(11):801-816. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00792-9.
4
Anticholinergics for Overactive Bladder in Frail and Medically Complex Older People: The Case For.抗胆碱能药物用于体弱且患有多种疾病的老年人膀胱过度活动症:支持理由
Drugs Aging. 2018 Sep;35(9):777-780. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0577-8.
5
An investigation of factors predicting the type of bladder antimuscarinics initiated in Medicare nursing homes residents.一项调查预测因素在医疗保险护理院居民中启动的膀胱抗毒蕈碱药物的类型。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0690-2.
6
Adverse events and treatment discontinuations of antimuscarinics for the treatment of overactive bladder in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗毒蕈碱药物治疗老年女性膀胱过度活动症的不良事件和治疗中断情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Mar-Apr;69:77-96. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
Social, Economic, and Medical Factors Associated With Solifenacin Therapy Compliance Among Workers Who Suffer From Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.下尿路症状患者中与索利那新治疗依从性相关的社会、经济和医学因素
Int Neurourol J. 2016 Sep;20(3):240-249. doi: 10.5213/inj.1632520.260. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
8
Antimuscarinic Medication Use in Elderly Patients with Overactive Bladder.抗毒蕈碱药物在老年膀胱过度活动症患者中的应用
Drugs Aging. 2016 Oct;33(10):755-763. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0399-5.
9
Does BMI, gender or age affect efficacy/tolerability of solifenacin in the management of overactive bladder?体重指数、性别或年龄是否会影响索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症的疗效/耐受性?
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar;28(3):477-488. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3130-5. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
10
The efficacy of different doses of solifenacin in elderly patients after treating a urinary tract infection.不同剂量索利那新治疗老年患者尿路感染后的疗效
Arab J Urol. 2015 Sep;13(3):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 5.