Ishiyama Tadahiko, Kashimoto Satoshi, Oguchi Takeshi, Furuya Atsushi, Fukushima Hisashi, Kumazawa Teruo
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Japan.
J Clin Anesth. 2006 May;18(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.005.
To evaluate the effects of clonidine and ephedrine on propofol-induced pain and on hemodynamic changes during the induction sequence.
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
The study was conducted at a university hospital.
200 ASA physical status I or II adult patients scheduled for elective surgery.
Patients were randomly allocated to one of 4 groups (50 patients per group): clonidine-ephedrine (CE), clonidine-saline (CS), diazepam-ephedrine (DE), and diazepam-saline (DS). Thirty seconds after the administration of ephedrine or saline, propofol 2 mg/kg was infused at a rate of 18.3 mL/min.
Patients were asked whether they had pain due to propofol injection. A blinded investigator evaluated the pain score: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = severe pain without behavioral signs such as grimace or arm withdrawal movement, and 3 = severe pain accompanied by behavioral signs. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured at 1-minute intervals from just before the administration of ephedrine or saline to 5 minutes after the tracheal intubation.
Median pain score in CE was significantly lower than those in the other groups (P < 0.0001). Pain scores in CS and DE were significantly lower than that in DS (P < 0.05). Ephedrine increased HR in CE and DE (P < 0.05), but clonidine did not augment the effect. Mean arterial blood pressure before tracheal intubation decreased to comparable values in all groups. After the intubation, mean arterial blood pressure and HR in CE and CS were significantly lower than those in DE and DS (P < 0.05).
Combination of clonidine and ephedrine effectively reduced propofol-induced pain, but did not prevent propofol-induced hypotension. Clonidine did not augment low dose of ephedrine-induced increase in HR and produced stable hemodynamic condition during the induction sequence.
评估可乐定和麻黄碱对异丙酚诱导的疼痛以及诱导期血流动力学变化的影响。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
研究在一家大学医院进行。
200例拟行择期手术的ASA身体状况为I或II级的成年患者。
患者被随机分配到4组之一(每组50例患者):可乐定 - 麻黄碱组(CE)、可乐定 - 生理盐水组(CS)、地西泮 - 麻黄碱组(DE)和地西泮 - 生理盐水组(DS)。给予麻黄碱或生理盐水30秒后,以18.3 mL/分钟的速率输注2 mg/kg异丙酚。
询问患者是否有因异丙酚注射引起的疼痛。一名盲法研究者评估疼痛评分:0 = 无疼痛,1 = 轻度疼痛,2 = 重度疼痛但无如皱眉或手臂回缩动作等行为体征,3 = 重度疼痛伴有行为体征。从给予麻黄碱或生理盐水前直至气管插管后5分钟,每隔1分钟测量平均动脉血压(MAP)和心率(HR)。
CE组的疼痛评分中位数显著低于其他组(P < 0.0001)。CS组和DE组的疼痛评分显著低于DS组(P < 0.05)。麻黄碱使CE组和DE组的HR升高(P < 0.05),但可乐定未增强该效应。气管插管前所有组的平均动脉血压降至相似值。插管后,CE组和CS组的平均动脉血压和HR显著低于DE组和DS组(P < 0.05)。
可乐定和麻黄碱联合使用可有效减轻异丙酚诱导的疼痛,但不能预防异丙酚诱导的低血压。可乐定未增强低剂量麻黄碱引起的HR升高,且在诱导期产生稳定的血流动力学状态。