Blue Carolyn L, Marrero David G
School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 May-Jun;38(3):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.01.010.
To examine the validity and reliability of Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) scales for healthful eating for persons at risk for diabetes.
Cross-sectional, using a self-administered questionnaire.
Community in the Midwest.
106 adults who self-identified based on one or more American Diabetes Association diabetes risks.
Behavioral, normative, and control beliefs; and attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention to eat a healthful diet.
Construct validity was assessed with factor analyses and measurement and structural models using structural equation modeling. Reliability of the scales was assessed with Cronbach alpha and a 2-month test-retest.
Factor analysis loadings were greater than .37. Cronbach alphas for the behavioral, normative, and control belief scales were .80, .91, and .84, respectively. The measurement model revealed that the measures were significant estimates for the TPB constructs, and they fit well as indirect measures of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in predicting intention to eat a healthful diet. Test-retest revealed 2-month stability of the scales.
Scales for measuring TPB behavioral, normative, and control beliefs were valid and reliable for use with adults at risk for diabetes. Further examination with minority persons is warranted.
检验计划行为理论(TPB)量表在糖尿病高危人群健康饮食方面的有效性和可靠性。
横断面研究,采用自填式问卷。
美国中西部社区。
106名根据美国糖尿病协会一项或多项糖尿病风险自我认定的成年人。
行为、规范和控制信念;以及对健康饮食的态度、主观规范、感知行为控制和意图。
使用结构方程模型通过因子分析以及测量和结构模型评估结构效度。使用克朗巴哈α系数和2个月的重测法评估量表的信度。
因子分析载荷大于0.37。行为、规范和控制信念量表的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.80、0.91和0.84。测量模型表明,这些测量对TPB结构是显著估计值,并且作为预测健康饮食意图时态度、主观规范和感知行为控制的间接测量,它们拟合良好。重测显示量表在2个月内具有稳定性。
测量TPB行为、规范和控制信念的量表对于糖尿病高危成年人是有效且可靠的。有必要对少数族裔人群进行进一步研究。