Dungan Kathleen M, Buse John B, Largay Joseph, Kelly Mary M, Button Eric A, Kato Shuhei, Wittlin Steven
Division of Endocrinology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2006 Jun;29(6):1214-9. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1910.
Postprandial hyperglycemia is often inadequately assessed in diabetes management. Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) drops as serum glucose rises above the renal threshold for glucose and has been proposed as a marker for postprandial hyperglycemia. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the relationship between 1,5-AG and postprandial hyperglycemia, as assessed by the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in suboptimally controlled patients with diabetes.
Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and an HbA(1c) (A1C) between 6.5 and 8% with stable glycemic control were recruited from two sites. A CGMS monitor was worn for two consecutive 72-h periods. Mean glucose, mean postmeal maximum glucose (MPMG), and area under the curve for glucose above 180 mg/dl (AUC-180), were compared with 1,5-AG, fructosamine (FA), and A1C at baseline, day 4, and day 7.
1,5-AG varied considerably between patients (6.5 +/- 3.2 mug/ml [means +/- SD]) despite similar A1C (7.3 +/- 0.5%). Mean 1,5-AG (r = -0.45, P = 0.006) correlated with AUC-180 more robustly than A1C (r = 0.33, P = 0.057) or FA (r = 0.38, P = 0.88). MPMG correlated more strongly with 1,5-AG (r = -0.54, P = 0.004) than with A1C (r = 0.40, P = 0.03) or FA (r = 0.32, P = 0.07).
1,5-AG reflects glycemic excursions, often in the postprandial state, more robustly than A1C or FA. 1,5-AG may be useful as a complementary marker to A1C to assess glycemic control in moderately controlled patients with diabetes.
在糖尿病管理中,餐后高血糖常常未得到充分评估。随着血清葡萄糖升高超过肾脏葡萄糖阈值,血清1,5 - 脱水葡萄糖醇(1,5 - AG)会下降,它已被提议作为餐后高血糖的一个标志物。本研究的目的是通过连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)来证明在血糖控制欠佳的糖尿病患者中1,5 - AG与餐后高血糖之间的关系。
从两个地点招募1型或2型糖尿病患者,其糖化血红蛋白(HbA₁c)(A1C)在6.5%至8%之间且血糖控制稳定。连续佩戴CGMS监测仪两个72小时时间段。在基线、第4天和第7天,将平均血糖、平均餐后最高血糖(MPMG)以及血糖高于180mg/dl时的曲线下面积(AUC - 180)与1,5 - AG、果糖胺(FA)和A1C进行比较。
尽管A1C相似(7.3%±0.5%),但患者之间的1,5 - AG差异很大(6.5±3.2μg/ml [均值±标准差])。平均1,5 - AG(r = -0.45,P = 0.006)与AUC - 180的相关性比A1C(r = 0.33,P = 0.057)或FA(r = 0.38,P = 0.088)更强。MPMG与1,5 - AG的相关性(r = -0.54,P = 0.004)比与A1C(r = 0.40,P = 0.03)或FA(r = 0.32,P = 0.07)更强。
与A1C或FA相比,1,5 - AG能更有力地反映血糖波动情况,通常是餐后状态下的波动。1,5 - AG可能作为A1C的补充标志物,用于评估中度控制的糖尿病患者的血糖控制情况。