曲美苄胺/苯海拉明与舒马曲坦治疗急性偏头痛的临床试验。

A clinical trial of trimethobenzamide/diphenhydramine versus sumatriptan for acute migraines.

作者信息

Friedman Benjamin W, Hochberg Michael, Esses David, Bijur Polly E, Corbo Jill, Paternoster Joseph, Solorzano Clemencia, Toosi Babak, Lipton Richard B, Gallagher E John

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2006 Jun;46(6):934-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00467.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although various classes of medication are used to treat acute migraine in the emergency department (ED), no treatment offers complete pain relief without side effects or recurrence of headache. Consequently, even though several antiemetic medications as well as SQ sumatriptan have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability for the ED treatment of migraine, there remains a need for more effective parenteral therapies. Open-label studies suggest that the combination of trimethobenzamide and diphenhydramine (TMB/DPH) may provide effective relief in a high proportion of migraineurs.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that ED patients with acute migraine, given intramuscular TMB/DPH, would have a larger reduction in their pain scores than patients given SQ sumatriptan.

METHODS

This was an ED-based, randomized, double-blind, "double-dummy" clinical trial comparing 2 parenteral treatments for acute migraine headaches. Subjects received a combination of TMB 200 mg and DPH 25 mg as a single intramuscular injection or 6 mg of SQ sumatriptan. Pain scores, disability scores, associated symptoms, and adverse effects were assessed for 2 hours in the ED and by telephone 24 hours after medication administration. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in reduction of pain intensity as measured by a validated numerical rating scale 2 hours after medication administration. This study was designed to detect superiority of TMB/DPH; therefore, a 1-tailed t-test was used. An interim analysis was planned to terminate the trial if predetermined endpoints in the primary outcome variable were reached.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped by the data monitoring committee after 40 subjects were enrolled because a substantial benefit in the primary outcome was found favoring sumatriptan. Baseline pain scores were comparable between the 2 groups. By 2 hours, sumatriptan subjects had improved by a mean of 6.1 and the TMB/DPH subjects had improved by a mean of 4.4 (95% CI for difference of 1.7: -0.1 to 3.4). By 24 hours after medication administration, sumatriptan subjects had a mean improvement from baseline of 4.9 as compared to 5.3 for TMB (95% CI for difference of -0.4: -2.4 to 1.6). The need for rescue medication was comparable between the groups. No serious or frequent adverse effects were noted in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

SQ sumatriptan is probably superior to TMB/DPH for treating the pain of acute migraine at 2 hours. However, TMB/DPH was well-tolerated, efficacious, and relieved pain comparably to sumatriptan at 24 hours. TMB/DPH might have a role in select populations in which sumatriptan is contraindicated or likely to be ineffective.

摘要

背景

尽管在急诊科(ED)使用了各类药物来治疗急性偏头痛,但尚无一种治疗方法能在无副作用或头痛不复发的情况下完全缓解疼痛。因此,尽管几种止吐药物以及皮下注射舒马曲坦已证明对急诊科偏头痛治疗有效且耐受性良好,但仍需要更有效的肠外治疗方法。开放标签研究表明,三甲氧苯酰胺和苯海拉明(TMB/DPH)联合使用可能使很大一部分偏头痛患者得到有效缓解。

目的

检验以下假设:与接受皮下注射舒马曲坦的患者相比,接受肌肉注射TMB/DPH的急性偏头痛ED患者疼痛评分降低幅度更大。

方法

这是一项基于急诊科的随机、双盲、“双模拟”临床试验,比较两种用于治疗急性偏头痛的肠外治疗方法。受试者接受单次肌肉注射200mg TMB与25mg DPH的组合或6mg皮下注射舒马曲坦。在急诊科对疼痛评分、残疾评分、相关症状和不良反应进行2小时评估,并在给药后24小时通过电话进行评估。主要结局是给药后2小时通过有效数字评分量表测量的组间疼痛强度降低差异。本研究旨在检测TMB/DPH的优越性;因此,使用单尾t检验。计划进行中期分析,若主要结局变量达到预定终点则终止试验。

结果

在招募了40名受试者后,数据监测委员会停止了试验,因为发现主要结局中舒马曲坦有显著优势。两组的基线疼痛评分相当。到2小时时,舒马曲坦组受试者平均改善了6.1分,TMB/DPH组受试者平均改善了4.4分(差异的95%CI为1.7:-0.1至3.4)。给药后24小时,舒马曲坦组受试者自基线的平均改善为4.9分,而TMB组为5.3分(差异的95%CI为-0.4:-2.4至1.6)。两组对急救药物的需求相当。两组均未观察到严重或频繁的不良反应。

结论

皮下注射舒马曲坦在2小时时治疗急性偏头痛疼痛可能优于TMB/DPH。然而,TMB/DPH耐受性良好、有效,且在24小时时缓解疼痛的效果与舒马曲坦相当。在舒马曲坦禁忌或可能无效的特定人群中,TMB/DPH可能有一定作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索