Andresen Reimer, Radmer Sebastian, Scheufler Oliver, Adam Carsten, Bogusch Gottfried
Abteilung für Bildgebende Diagnostik und Interventionelle Radiologie, KMG Klinikum Güstrow, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Rostock.
Rontgenpraxis. 2006;56(2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rontge.2005.08.001.
Fractures of the hook of the hamate are a rare event. The fracture cannot always be detected clinically and standard radiographs do not always provide an overlap-free image of the hook of the hamate, so that fractures can easily be overlooked. The objective of the present study was to examine if the sensitivity of detecting hamulus ossis hamati fractures can further be improved by a modified conventional radiographic projection. After dissection of the hook of the hamate on 10 cadaver hands, a fracture was produced close to the base using a surgical chisel. Conventional radiographs were then performed in four different projections (dorso-palmar, lateral, carpal-tunnel and oblique view). The oblique view was obtained in a 45 degrees supination position, slight extension and radial duction, with the tube tilted from distal to proximal by 30 degrees. An axial spiral CT was used as a reference for detection of the fracture. The highest sensitivity of the conventional radiographs, with 8/10 identified fractures (80%), was achieved by the oblique view. The carpal-tunnel view with 4/10 (40%) and the dorso-palmar projection with 3/10 (30%) were much lower. All fractures were missed in the lateral projection. If all of the conventional radiographic projections are taken into account, the sensitivity is increased to 90%. All of the fractures were reliably detected in the axial CT-image. If a hamulus ossis hamati fracture is suspected clinically, in addition to the dorso-palmar and carpal-tunnel view, the special oblique view described here should be performed as a third projection plane, while the lateral view can be dispensed with. However, even if all projections are taken into account, a negative finding in the conventional radiographic imaging does not exclude a fracture with absolute certainty. In such cases, a CT or MRI should be performed to exclude a fracture.
钩骨钩骨折是一种罕见的情况。临床上并非总能检测到骨折,标准X线片也并非总能提供无重叠的钩骨钩影像,因此骨折很容易被忽视。本研究的目的是探讨通过改良的传统X线投照方式能否进一步提高检测钩骨钩骨折的敏感性。在10具尸体手部解剖出钩骨钩后,用手术凿在靠近基部处制造骨折。然后以四种不同的投照方式(背掌位、侧位、腕管位和斜位)进行传统X线摄影。斜位投照是在旋前45度、轻度伸展和桡侧外展的位置进行,球管从远端向近端倾斜30度。轴向螺旋CT用作骨折检测的参考。传统X线片中,斜位投照的敏感性最高,10例骨折中有8例被识别(80%)。腕管位有4/10(40%),背掌位有3/10(30%),敏感性要低得多。侧位投照未能检测到任何骨折。如果综合考虑所有传统X线投照方式,敏感性可提高到90%。轴向CT图像能可靠地检测到所有骨折。如果临床上怀疑钩骨钩骨折,除背掌位和腕管位外,应将此处描述的特殊斜位作为第三个投照平面进行检查,而侧位投照可省略。然而,即使综合考虑所有投照方式,传统X线成像的阴性结果也不能绝对排除骨折。在这种情况下,应进行CT或MRI检查以排除骨折。