Gibson Aaron P, Bettinger Tawny L, Patel Nick C, Crismon M Lynn
College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1134-42. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G582. Epub 2006 May 30.
To identify, review, and analyze studies comparing atomoxetine with psychostimulants with the intent of determining the role of atomoxetine in the pharmacologic management of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Primary, review, and meta-analysis articles were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-December 2005). MeSH headings used in the search include: attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, ADHD, atomoxetine, stimulants, psychostimulants, methylphenidate, and amphetamine salts. Relevant data presented at professional meetings that we attended were also identified.
All clinical studies comparing atomoxetine with psychostimulants, regardless of study design, were evaluated. Relevant efficacy and safety data from these studies were included in the discussion.
At time of writing, 5 head-to-head trials had compared psychostimulants and atomoxetine in the treatment of ADHD. No significant difference between atomoxetine and methylphenidate immediate-release were found on the ADHD Rating Scale total score. Osmotic oral release system (OROS) methylphenidate showed significantly greater improvement at weeks 1 and 2, and significantly more patients treated with OROS methylphenidate were classified as responders. Patients on both atomoxetine and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR) showed significant improvements at endpoint over baseline; however, Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) scores were significantly better with MAS XR. Tolerability was similar between atomoxetine and stimulant medications.
Based on available evidence, psychostimulants are regarded as first-line pharmacologic treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD, as the efficacy and safety of these agents have been well established based on clinical trials and extensive naturalistic use. Adverse effects in some patients and abuse potential have led to the search for new treatments. Atomoxetine represents an alternative treatment for ADHD and is unlikely to be associated with abuse; however, long-term safety data are needed to further establish its place in therapy.
识别、回顾和分析比较托莫西汀与精神兴奋剂的研究,以确定托莫西汀在注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)药物治疗中的作用。
通过MEDLINE检索(1966年至2005年12月)确定了原始研究、综述和荟萃分析文章。检索中使用的医学主题词包括:注意力缺陷/多动障碍、ADHD、托莫西汀、兴奋剂、精神兴奋剂、哌甲酯和苯丙胺盐。我们还识别了在参加的专业会议上展示的相关数据。
评估了所有比较托莫西汀与精神兴奋剂的临床研究,无论其研究设计如何。这些研究的相关疗效和安全性数据纳入了讨论。
在撰写本文时,有5项头对头试验比较了精神兴奋剂和托莫西汀治疗ADHD的效果。在ADHD评定量表总分上,未发现托莫西汀与速释哌甲酯之间存在显著差异。渗透型口服缓释系统(OROS)哌甲酯在第1周和第2周显示出显著更大的改善,并且接受OROS哌甲酯治疗的患者中被归类为有反应者的显著更多。服用托莫西汀和混合苯丙胺盐缓释剂(MAS XR)的患者在终点时均较基线有显著改善;然而,MAS XR的斯旺森、科特金、阿格勒、M - 弗林和佩勒姆(SKAMP)评分显著更好。托莫西汀和兴奋剂药物之间的耐受性相似。
基于现有证据,精神兴奋剂被视为儿童和青少年ADHD的一线药物治疗,因为这些药物的疗效和安全性已通过临床试验和广泛的自然使用得到充分确立。一些患者的不良反应和滥用可能性促使人们寻找新的治疗方法。托莫西汀是ADHD的一种替代治疗方法,不太可能与滥用相关;然而,需要长期安全性数据来进一步确定其在治疗中的地位。