Suppr超能文献

从头算和密度泛函理论对气相一水合硫酸和硫酸氢铵的再研究。

Ab initio and density functional theory reinvestigation of gas-phase sulfuric acid monohydrate and ammonium hydrogen sulfate.

作者信息

Kurtén Theo, Sundberg Markku R, Vehkamäki Hanna, Noppel Madis, Blomqvist Johanna, Kulmala Markku

机构信息

Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Phys Chem A. 2006 Jun 8;110(22):7178-88. doi: 10.1021/jp0613081.

Abstract

We have calculated the thermochemical parameters for the reactions H(2)SO(4) + H(2)O <--> H(2)SO(4).H(2)O and H(2)SO(4) + NH(3) <--> H(2)SO(4).NH(3) using the B3LYP and PW91 functionals, MP2 perturbation theory and four different basis sets. Different methods and basis sets yield very different results with respect to, for example, the reaction free energies. A large part, but not all, of these differences are caused by basis set superposition error (BSSE), which is on the order of 1-3 kcal mol(-1) for most method/basis set combinations used in previous studies. Complete basis set extrapolation (CBS) calculations using the cc-pV(X+d)Z and aug-cc-pV(X+d)Z basis sets (with X = D, T, Q) at the B3LYP level indicate that if BSSE errors of less than 0.2 kcal mol(-1) are desired in uncorrected calculations, basis sets of at least aug-cc-pV(T+d)Z quality should be used. The use of additional augmented basis functions is also shown to be important, as the BSSE error is significant for the nonaugmented basis sets even at the quadruple-zeta level. The effect of anharmonic corrections to the zero-point energies and thermal contributions to the free energy are shown to be around 0.4 kcal mol(-1) for the H(2)SO(4).H(2)O cluster at 298 K. Single-point CCSD(T) calculations for the H(2)SO(4).H(2)O cluster also indicate that B3LYP and MP2 calculations reproduce the CCSD(T) energies well, whereas the PW91 results are significantly overbinding. However, basis-set limit extrapolations at the CCSD(T) level indicate that the B3LYP binding energies are too low by ca. 1-2 kcal/mol. This probably explains the difference of about 2 kcal mol(-1) for the free energy of the H(2)SO(4) + H(2)O <--> H(2)SO(4).H(2)O reaction between the counterpoise-corrected B3LYP calculations with large basis sets and the diffusion-based experimental values of S. M. Ball, D. R. Hanson, F. L Eisele and P. H. McMurry (J. Phys. Chem. A. 2000, 104, 1715). Topological analysis of the electronic charge density based on the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) shows that different method/basis set combinations lead to qualitatively different bonding patterns for the H(2)SO(4).NH(3) cluster. Using QTAIM analysis, we have also defined a proton transfer degree parameter which may be useful in further studies.

摘要

我们使用B3LYP和PW91泛函、MP2微扰理论以及四种不同的基组,计算了反应H₂SO₄ + H₂O ⇌ H₂SO₄·H₂O和H₂SO₄ + NH₃ ⇌ H₂SO₄·NH₃的热化学参数。不同的方法和基组在例如反应自由能方面产生非常不同的结果。这些差异的很大一部分(但不是全部)是由基组叠加误差(BSSE)引起的,对于先前研究中使用的大多数方法/基组组合,其量级为1 - 3 kcal mol⁻¹。在B3LYP水平上使用cc-pV(X+d)Z和aug-cc-pV(X+d)Z基组(X = D、T、Q)进行的完全基组外推(CBS)计算表明,如果在未校正的计算中希望BSSE误差小于0.2 kcal mol⁻¹,则应使用至少aug-cc-pV(T+d)Z质量的基组。还表明使用额外的增强基函数很重要,因为即使在四重zeta水平,非增强基组的BSSE误差也很显著。对于H₂SO₄·H₂O团簇,在298 K时,零点能的非谐校正和自由能的热贡献的影响约为0.4 kcal mol⁻¹。对H₂SO₄·H₂O团簇进行的单点CCSD(T)计算还表明,B3LYP和MP2计算能很好地重现CCSD(T)能量,而PW91结果的结合能明显过高。然而,在CCSD(T)水平上的基组极限外推表明,B3LYP结合能大约低了1 - 2 kcal/mol。这可能解释了在使用大基组的平衡校正B3LYP计算与S. M. Ball、D. R. Hanson、F. L Eisele和P. H. McMurry(《物理化学杂志A》,2000年,104卷,1715页)基于扩散的实验值之间,H₂SO₄ + H₂O ⇌ H₂SO₄·H₂O反应的自由能存在约2 kcal mol⁻¹差异的原因。基于分子中原子的量子理论(QTAIM)对电子电荷密度的拓扑分析表明,不同的方法/基组组合导致H₂SO₄·NH₃团簇的键合模式在定性上有所不同。使用QTAIM分析,我们还定义了一个质子转移程度参数,这可能在进一步的研究中有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验