• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锤骨-镫骨组件:两种假体的使用经验。

Malleus-stapes assembly: experience with two prostheses.

作者信息

Al-Qudah M, Dawes P J D

机构信息

Department of ORL-HNS, Division of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Sep;120(9):736-9. doi: 10.1017/S002221510600168X. Epub 2006 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1017/S002221510600168X
PMID:16740203
Abstract

Tympanoplasty is often a necessary part of middle-ear surgery, the most common defect being that between an intact, mobile stapes and the malleus handle. The most readily available tissue is the patient's incus, reshaped to bridge the space between an intact stapes and the malleus. When the incus cannot be used, the hydroxyapatite Wehrs incus prosthesis can be used as an alternative.Twenty-six patients had an autograft incus ossiculoplasty and 20 patients underwent modified Wehrs incus prosthesis ossiculoplasty. The average post-operative air-bone gaps (ABGs) were 16.2 dB hearing loss (dBHL) and 17.2 dBHL, respectively. Air-bone gap closure to within 15 dBHL was achieved for 48 per cent of incus autografts and for 57 per cent of Wehrs prostheses, and to within 20 dBHL for 77 per cent and 62 per cent, respectively. Over four years follow up, the reconstruction was stable for each group, the ABGs being 17.7 dBHL and 17.1 dBHL, respectively.

摘要

鼓室成形术通常是中耳手术的必要组成部分,最常见的缺损是完整、可活动的镫骨与锤骨柄之间的缺损。最容易获取的组织是患者自身的砧骨,将其重塑以桥接完整的镫骨与锤骨之间的间隙。当无法使用砧骨时,可使用羟基磷灰石韦尔斯砧骨假体作为替代。26例患者接受了自体砧骨听骨成形术,20例患者接受了改良韦尔斯砧骨假体听骨成形术。术后平均气骨间隙(ABG)分别为听力损失16.2 dB(dBHL)和17.2 dBHL。48%的自体砧骨移植和气骨间隙缩小至15 dBHL以内,57%的韦尔斯假体达到此效果;分别有77%和62%的患者气骨间隙缩小至20 dBHL以内。经过四年的随访,每组的重建情况都很稳定,气骨间隙分别为17.7 dBHL和17.1 dBHL。

相似文献

1
Malleus-stapes assembly: experience with two prostheses.锤骨-镫骨组件:两种假体的使用经验。
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Sep;120(9):736-9. doi: 10.1017/S002221510600168X. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
2
[Tympanoplasty with incus interposition].[砧骨植入鼓室成形术]
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Jan;67(1):31-3.
3
Manubrio-stapedioplasty: new surgical technique for malleus and incus fixation due to tympanosclerosis.柄骨-镫骨成形术:治疗鼓室硬化症所致锤骨和砧骨固定的新手术技术。
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Jun;129(6):587-90. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115000973. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
4
Malleus to Stapes Bone Cement Rebridging Ossiculoplasty: Why Don't We Perform Frequently?锤骨至镫骨骨水泥再桥接听骨成形术:为何我们不常开展?
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Jun;125(6):445-51. doi: 10.1177/0003489415618678. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
5
How we do it: modified Wehrs incus ossiculoplasty.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Oct;30(5):461-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01051.x.
6
Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with glass ionomer cement: a case report.使用玻璃离子水门汀进行砧镫关节再桥接听骨成形术:一例报告
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2007;17(3):183-6.
7
Physiologic reestablishment of ossicular continuity during excision of retraction pockets: use of hydroxyapatite bone cement for rebridging the incus.在回缩袋切除术中听骨链连续性的生理性重建:使用羟基磷灰石骨水泥重建砧骨。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Feb;132(2):196-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.2.196.
8
[Ossicular reconstruction with autograft in type III].[Ⅲ型自体骨听骨链重建术]
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2005;126(1):19-23.
9
A new prosthesis for reconstructing the incudostapedial joint.一种用于重建砧镫关节的新型假体。
Am J Otol. 1997 Sep;18(5):540-3.
10
Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.部分听骨链重建:三种不同假体在临床和实验研究中的比较
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):332-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819679dd.

引用本文的文献

1
[Comparative analysis of the hearing of three type reconstruction material in type Ⅱ tympanoplasty of 286 cases].[286例Ⅱ型鼓室成形术中三种类型重建材料听力的比较分析]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar;35(3):212-215. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.03.005.