Miller M R, Clark J S, Lehmann C U
Department of Pediatrics and Center for Innovations in Quality Patient Care, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):208-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016733.
Despite the growing use of error reporting tools, the healthcare industry is inexperienced in receiving, understanding, and analyzing these reports.
To assess the accuracy and define the epidemiology of medication error reports.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A retrospective cohort study of 581 error reports containing 1010 medication errors reported between July 2001 and January 2003 at a large academic children's institution.
Correct classification and types of medication errors.
Of the 1010 medication errors reviewed, 298 (30%) were prescribing errors, 245 (24%) were dispensing errors, 410 (41%) were administration errors, and 57 (6%) involved medication administration records (MAR). Following expert review, 208 errors (21%) were deleted because they had been inappropriately coded as errors and 97 (10%) were added as they were not initially coded despite having occurred. In addition, 352 medication error reports needed to have the subtype of error reclassified; 207 (59%) of these involved the reporter choosing the non-descript "other" category on the reporting tool (such as "Prescribing other") which was able to be reclassified by expert review. The overall distribution of error type categories did not change significantly with expert review, although only MAR errors were underreported by the reporters. The most common medications were anti-infectives (17%), pain/sedative agents (15%), nutritional agents (11%), gastrointestinal agents (8%), and cardiovascular agents (7%).
Despite clear imperfections in the data captured, medication error reporting tools are effective as a means of collecting reliable information on errors rapidly and in real time. Our data suggest that administration errors are at least as common as prescribing errors in children. Further research is needed, not only in the area of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) for children, but also on ways to make the dispensing and administration of medications safer.
尽管错误报告工具的使用日益广泛,但医疗行业在接收、理解和分析这些报告方面经验不足。
评估用药错误报告的准确性并确定其流行病学特征。
设计、地点和患者:一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2001年7月至2003年1月期间在一家大型学术性儿童医院报告的581份包含1010起用药错误的错误报告。
用药错误的正确分类和类型。
在审查的1010起用药错误中,298起(30%)为处方错误,245起(24%)为调配错误,410起(41%)为给药错误,57起(6%)涉及用药记录(MAR)。经过专家审查,208起错误(21%)被删除,因为它们被不恰当地编码为错误;97起(10%)被添加,因为尽管发生了但最初未被编码。此外,352份用药错误报告需要重新分类错误亚型;其中207份(59%)涉及报告者在报告工具上选择了非描述性的“其他”类别(如“其他处方”),经专家审查能够重新分类。尽管报告者仅少报了MAR错误,但经专家审查后错误类型类别的总体分布没有显著变化。最常见的药物是抗感染药(17%)、止痛/镇静剂(15%)、营养剂(11%)、胃肠道药物(8%)和心血管药物(7%)。
尽管所收集的数据存在明显缺陷,但用药错误报告工具作为一种快速、实时收集可靠错误信息的手段是有效的。我们的数据表明,在儿童中给药错误至少与处方错误一样常见。不仅需要在儿童计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)领域进行进一步研究,还需要研究如何使药物调配和给药更安全。