• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国对日本战时医疗暴行的掩盖:出于国家利益的同谋行为及当代行动的两项提议。

The United States cover-up of Japanese wartime medical atrocities: complicity committed in the national interest and two proposals for contemporary action.

作者信息

Nie Jing-Bao

机构信息

Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):W21-33. doi: 10.1080/15265160600686356.

DOI:10.1080/15265160600686356
PMID:16754432
Abstract

To monopolize the scientific data gained by Japanese physicians and researchers from vivisections and other barbarous experiments performed on living humans in biological warfare programs such as Unit 731, immediately after the war the United States (US) government secretly granted those involved immunity from war crimes prosecution, withdrew vital information from the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, and publicly denounced otherwise irrefutable evidence from other sources such as the Russian Khabarovsk trial. Acting in "the national interest" and for the security of the US, authorities in the US tramped justice and morality, and engaged in what the English common law tradition clearly defines as "complicity after the fact." To repair this historical injustice, the US government should issue an official apology and offer appropriate compensation for having covered up Japanese medical war crimes for six decades. To help prevent similar acts of aiding principal offender(s) in the future, international declarations or codes of human rights and medical ethics should include a clause banning any kind of complicity in any unethical medicine-whether before or after the fact-by any state or group for whatever reasons.

摘要

为了独占日本医生和研究人员在诸如731部队等生物战计划中对活人进行活体解剖及其他野蛮实验所获取的科学数据,战后美国政府立即秘密给予相关人员免于战犯起诉的豁免权,从远东国际军事法庭撤回重要信息,并公然诋毁来自其他渠道(如苏联哈巴罗夫斯克审判)的无可辩驳的证据。美国当局出于“国家利益”和美国安全的考虑,践踏了正义和道德,犯下了英国普通法传统明确界定的“事后同谋罪”。为了纠正这一历史不公,美国政府应正式道歉,并为掩盖日本医疗战争罪行长达六十年一事提供适当赔偿。为了帮助防止未来出现类似的协助主犯的行为,国际人权宣言或医学伦理准则应纳入一项条款,禁止任何国家或团体出于任何原因,在任何不道德医学行为(无论事前还是事后)中进行任何形式的同谋。

相似文献

1
The United States cover-up of Japanese wartime medical atrocities: complicity committed in the national interest and two proposals for contemporary action.美国对日本战时医疗暴行的掩盖:出于国家利益的同谋行为及当代行动的两项提议。
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):W21-33. doi: 10.1080/15265160600686356.
2
Unit 731 and moral repair.731部队与道德修复。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):270-276. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103177. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
U.S. Complicity and Japan's Wartime Medical Atrocities: Time for a Response.美国的共谋和日本的战时医疗暴行:是时候做出回应了。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):40-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028659.
4
U.S. responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II.二战后美国对日本战时非人道人体实验的回应。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Apr;23(2):220-30. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000753.
5
The West's dismissal of the Khabarovsk trial as 'communist propaganda': ideology, evidence and international bioethics.西方将哈巴罗夫斯克审判斥为“共产主义宣传”:意识形态、证据与国际生物伦理
J Bioeth Inq. 2004;1(1):32-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02448905.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Russian medicine and the Nuremberg trials.俄罗斯医学与纽伦堡审判。
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Jun;16(3):229. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl038. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
8
Doctors and torture.医生与酷刑。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):415-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048065.
9
The medical exam as political humiliation.作为政治羞辱的医学检查。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Spring;4(2):W20. doi: 10.1162/152651604323097943.
10
Japanese death factories and the American cover-up.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997 Spring;6(2):240-2. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100007866.

引用本文的文献

1
In the Shadow of Biological Warfare: Conspiracy Theories on the Origins of COVID-19 and Enhancing Global Governance of Biosafety as a Matter of Urgency.在生物战的阴影下:关于 COVID-19 起源的阴谋论,以及作为紧急事项加强全球生物安全治理。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10025-8. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
2
Should Internet Researchers Use Ill-Gotten Information?网络研究人员应该使用非法获取的信息吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1221-1240. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9935-x. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Healing Without Waging War: Beyond Military Metaphors in Medicine and HIV Cure Research.
治愈无须兵戎相见:超越医学和 HIV 治愈研究中的军事隐喻。
Am J Bioeth. 2016 Oct;16(10):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1214305.
4
U.S. responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II.二战后美国对日本战时非人道人体实验的回应。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Apr;23(2):220-30. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000753.
5
Twenty-first Century ethics of medical research involving human subjects: achievements and challenges.21世纪涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理:成就与挑战
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):153-63. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9319-2. Epub 2008 Jan 11.