• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭互联网使用会影响低收入家庭儿童的学业成绩吗?

Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children?

作者信息

Jackson Linda A, von Eye Alexander, Biocca Frank A, Barbatsis Gretchen, Zhao Yong, Fitzgerald Hiram E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):429-35. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.429.

DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.429
PMID:16756435
Abstract

HomeNetToo is a longitudinal field study designed to examine the antecedents and consequences of home Internet use in low-income families (http://www.HomeNetToo.org). The study was done between December 2000 and June 2002. Among the consequences considered was children's academic performance. Participants were 140 children, mostly African American (83%), mostly boys (58%), and most living in single-parent households (75%) in which the median annual income was 15,000 (U.S. dollars) or less. Average age was 13.8 years. Ages ranged between 10 and 18 years, Internet use was continuously recorded, and multiple measures of academic performance were obtained during the 16-month trial. Findings indicated that children who used the Internet more had higher scores on standardized tests of reading achievement and higher grade point averages 6 months, 1 year, and 16 months later than did children who used it less. Older children used the Internet more than did younger children, but age had no effect on the nature or the academic performance benefits of Internet use. Implications for the digital "use" divide are discussed.

摘要

“家庭网络二号”(HomeNetToo)是一项纵向实地研究,旨在调查低收入家庭使用家庭互联网的前因后果(http://www.HomeNetToo.org)。该研究于2000年12月至2002年6月期间进行。研究考虑的后果之一是儿童的学业成绩。研究对象为140名儿童,其中大多数是非裔美国人(83%),大多数是男孩(58%),大多数生活在单亲家庭(75%),这些家庭的年中位数收入为15,000美元或更低。平均年龄为13.8岁。年龄在10至18岁之间,在为期16个月的试验期间持续记录互联网使用情况,并获取了多项学业成绩衡量指标。研究结果表明,与较少使用互联网的儿童相比,较多使用互联网的儿童在阅读成绩标准化测试中的得分更高,在6个月、1年和16个月后的平均绩点也更高。年龄较大的儿童比年龄较小的儿童使用互联网更多,但年龄对互联网使用的性质或学业成绩益处没有影响。文中讨论了数字“使用”鸿沟的相关影响。

相似文献

1
Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children?家庭互联网使用会影响低收入家庭儿童的学业成绩吗?
Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):429-35. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.429.
2
What children do on the Internet: domains visited and their relationship to socio-demographic characteristics and academic performance.儿童在互联网上的行为:访问的领域及其与社会人口特征和学业成绩的关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Apr;10(2):182-90. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9970.
3
Examining the Black-White achievement gap among low-income children using the NICHD study of early child care and youth development.利用 NICHD 早期儿童保育与青少年发展研究考察低收入儿童的黑白成就差距。
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1404-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01620.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
4
Race, gender, and information technology use: the new digital divide.种族、性别与信息技术使用:新的数字鸿沟
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Aug;11(4):437-42. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0157.
5
Fathering quality in early childhood and kindergarten achievement in low-income racial-ethnic minority children.父亲在儿童早期的教养质量与低收入种族少数族裔儿童的幼儿园学业成就。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Mar;34(2):215-225. doi: 10.1037/fam0000611. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
7
Association of Child Poverty, Brain Development, and Academic Achievement.儿童贫困、大脑发育与学业成绩之间的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Sep;169(9):822-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1475.
8
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
9
Otitis media in early childhood in relation to children's school-age language and academic skills.儿童早期中耳炎与儿童学龄期语言及学业技能的关系。
Pediatrics. 2002 Oct;110(4):696-706. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.4.696.
10
Early Academic Achievement Among American Low-Income Black Students from Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Families.美国来自移民家庭和非移民家庭的低收入黑人学生的早期学业成就。
Prev Sci. 2015 Nov;16(8):1159-68. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0570-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing education inequalities through cloud-enabled live-cell biotechnology.通过基于云的活细胞生物技术减少教育不平等。
Trends Biotechnol. 2025 Jan;43(1):43-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.07.015. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
ICT literacy, resilience and online learning self-efficacy between Chinese rural and urban primary school students.中国农村和城市小学生在信息通信技术素养、适应能力和在线学习自我效能方面的差异
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 12;13:1051803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051803. eCollection 2022.
3
Reciprocity heightens academic performance in elementary school students.
互惠互利提高小学生的学业成绩。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 5;8(12):e11916. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11916. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Does Internet Entertainment Reduce the Cognitive Ability of Children? Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey.网络娱乐会降低儿童的认知能力吗?来自中国教育追踪调查的证据。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(10):364. doi: 10.3390/bs12100364.
5
Effect of internet use and electronic game-play on academic performance of Australian children.互联网使用和电子游戏对澳大利亚儿童学业成绩的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 10;10(1):21727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78916-9.
6
Children's Internet Use Profiles in Relation to Behavioral Problems in Lithuania, Latvia, and Taiwan.儿童互联网使用特征与立陶宛、拉脱维亚和中国台湾地区行为问题的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;17(22):8490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228490.
7
Using artificial intelligence methods to assess academic achievement in public high schools of a European Union country.使用人工智能方法评估欧盟某国公立高中的学业成绩。
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 9;6(6):e04081. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04081. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Differential impacts of different keyboard inputting methods on reading and writing skills.不同键盘输入方式对读写能力的影响差异。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 21;8(1):17183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35268-9.
9
Technology and interactive social media use among 8th and 10th graders in the U.S. and associations with homework and school grades.美国八年级和十年级学生的科技与互动社交媒体使用情况及其与家庭作业和学业成绩的关联。
Comput Human Behav. 2018 Sep;86:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
10
Impact of frequency of internet use on development of brain structures and verbal intelligence: Longitudinal analyses.互联网使用频率对大脑结构和言语智力发展的影响:纵向分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Nov;39(11):4471-4479. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24286. Epub 2018 Jun 28.