Greenberg Morris
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Jul;49(7):577-604. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20321.
In 1968 the British Occupational Hygiene Society (BOHS) published a chrysotile asbestos hygiene standard. As a consequence of acknowledged inadequacies of the data, it underestimated the risks of exposure, but its influence was international and operated for longer than it merited. Five years later, BOHS reported the standard not to be in need of amending, despite its own doubts and no cognizance having been taken of the cancer hazard. Within months, stung by criticism from Dr. Irving J. Selikoff, industry required it to review the standard, which BOHS continued to do for a number of years before giving up.
Material obtained for the American Courts by means of legal discovery from an asbestos company's archive, provided information on the membership of the new BOHS committees, and on its operation.
Alterations in the composition of the new committees included importantly the introduction of certain independent scientists, whose rigor militated against the ready production of a new hygiene standard acceptable to industry.
There was a time in Britain when a learned society might with impunity omit to consult the views of workers or their representatives when making value judgments about their health and safety, but consider it proper to accede to industry's decision as to what hygiene standard it would accept. Health and Safety at Work legislation in 1974, established an organization on which industry and labor were represented, with the onus for recommending hygiene standards. For several years the BOHS Asbestos Sub-Committee continued attempting to reconcile the interests of industry, until finally abandoning hygiene standard setting as its mission.
1968年,英国职业卫生学会(BOHS)发布了一项温石棉卫生标准。由于认识到数据存在不足,该标准低估了接触风险,但其影响具有国际性,且持续的时间超过了其应有的时长。五年后,尽管BOHS自身存在疑虑且未考虑到癌症危害,但仍报告该标准无需修订。几个月内,受欧文·J·塞利科夫博士批评的刺激,行业要求其重新审视该标准,BOHS在放弃之前又持续做了数年。
通过法律调查从一家石棉公司档案中获取的资料,为美国法院提供了有关BOHS新委员会成员及其运作情况的信息。
新委员会组成的变化主要包括引入了某些独立科学家,他们的严谨态度不利于迅速制定出行业可接受的新卫生标准。
在英国曾有一段时间,一个学术团体在对工人的健康和安全进行价值判断时,可能会毫无顾忌地忽略听取工人或其代表的意见,但却认为听从行业关于接受何种卫生标准的决定是恰当的。1974年的《工作场所健康与安全法》设立了一个行业和劳工均有代表参与的组织,由其负责推荐卫生标准。BOHS石棉小组委员会连续数年一直试图协调行业利益,直至最终放弃制定卫生标准这一使命。