• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订英国职业卫生学会石棉标准:1968年至1982年

Revising the British Occupational Hygiene Society asbestos standard: 1968-1982.

作者信息

Greenberg Morris

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2006 Jul;49(7):577-604. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20321.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.20321
PMID:16758489
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 1968 the British Occupational Hygiene Society (BOHS) published a chrysotile asbestos hygiene standard. As a consequence of acknowledged inadequacies of the data, it underestimated the risks of exposure, but its influence was international and operated for longer than it merited. Five years later, BOHS reported the standard not to be in need of amending, despite its own doubts and no cognizance having been taken of the cancer hazard. Within months, stung by criticism from Dr. Irving J. Selikoff, industry required it to review the standard, which BOHS continued to do for a number of years before giving up.

METHODS

Material obtained for the American Courts by means of legal discovery from an asbestos company's archive, provided information on the membership of the new BOHS committees, and on its operation.

RESULTS

Alterations in the composition of the new committees included importantly the introduction of certain independent scientists, whose rigor militated against the ready production of a new hygiene standard acceptable to industry.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a time in Britain when a learned society might with impunity omit to consult the views of workers or their representatives when making value judgments about their health and safety, but consider it proper to accede to industry's decision as to what hygiene standard it would accept. Health and Safety at Work legislation in 1974, established an organization on which industry and labor were represented, with the onus for recommending hygiene standards. For several years the BOHS Asbestos Sub-Committee continued attempting to reconcile the interests of industry, until finally abandoning hygiene standard setting as its mission.

摘要

背景

1968年,英国职业卫生学会(BOHS)发布了一项温石棉卫生标准。由于认识到数据存在不足,该标准低估了接触风险,但其影响具有国际性,且持续的时间超过了其应有的时长。五年后,尽管BOHS自身存在疑虑且未考虑到癌症危害,但仍报告该标准无需修订。几个月内,受欧文·J·塞利科夫博士批评的刺激,行业要求其重新审视该标准,BOHS在放弃之前又持续做了数年。

方法

通过法律调查从一家石棉公司档案中获取的资料,为美国法院提供了有关BOHS新委员会成员及其运作情况的信息。

结果

新委员会组成的变化主要包括引入了某些独立科学家,他们的严谨态度不利于迅速制定出行业可接受的新卫生标准。

结论

在英国曾有一段时间,一个学术团体在对工人的健康和安全进行价值判断时,可能会毫无顾忌地忽略听取工人或其代表的意见,但却认为听从行业关于接受何种卫生标准的决定是恰当的。1974年的《工作场所健康与安全法》设立了一个行业和劳工均有代表参与的组织,由其负责推荐卫生标准。BOHS石棉小组委员会连续数年一直试图协调行业利益,直至最终放弃制定卫生标准这一使命。

相似文献

1
Revising the British Occupational Hygiene Society asbestos standard: 1968-1982.修订英国职业卫生学会石棉标准:1968年至1982年
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Jul;49(7):577-604. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20321.
2
Commentary: the 1968 BOHS Chrysotile Asbestos Standard.评论:1968年英国职业卫生学会温石棉标准
Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Jan;47(1):3-6. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meg011.
3
Asbestos mining in Southern Africa, 1893-2002.1893年至2002年南非的石棉开采
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003 Jul-Sep;9(3):230-5. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2003.9.3.230.
4
The British approach to asbestos standard setting: 1898-2000.
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Nov;46(5):534-41. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20083.
5
Asbestos exposure among transmission mechanics in automotive repair shops.汽车修理店传动机械师的石棉暴露情况。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Apr;59(3):292-306. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu093. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
6
The defence of chrysotile, 1912-2007.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan-Mar;14(1):57-66. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2008.14.1.57.
7
Compensating the workers: industrial injury and compensation in the British asbestos industry, 1930s-60s.补偿工人:20世纪30年代至60年代英国石棉行业的工伤与赔偿
Bus Hist. 1999;41(2):102-20. doi: 10.1080/00076799900000259.
8
Asbestos hazard evaluation in South Korean textile production.韩国纺织品生产中的石棉危害评估。
Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(1):131-44. doi: 10.2190/27AB-6J6D-UDHK-QUPK.
9
Protection from asbestos exposure includes personal and area monitoring.
Occup Health Saf. 1990 Feb;59(2):27-31.
10
A review of historical exposures to asbestos among skilled craftsmen (1940-2006).熟练工匠(1940 - 2006年)石棉接触史回顾。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):319-77. doi: 10.1080/10937400601034191.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence Regarding the Impact of Conflicts of Interest on Environmental and Occupational Health Research.关于利益冲突对环境和职业健康研究影响的证据。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Jun;4(2):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0139-y.