Sotka Erik E, Palumbi Stephen R
Stanford University, Hopkins Marine Station and the Department of Biological Sciences, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA.
Ecology. 2006 May;87(5):1094-103. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1094:tuogct]2.0.co;2.
Many unresolved issues in the ecology and evolution of marine populations center on how far planktonic larvae disperse away from their parents. Genetic tools provide a promising way to define the spatial spread of larvae, yet their accurate interpretation depends on the extent to which genetic loci are under selection. Genetic clines, geographic zones in which genetically differentiated populations interbreed, provide opportunities to explicitly and simultaneously quantify the relative roles of selection and dispersal. Here, we review the theory and analysis of genetic clines and apply these techniques to published studies of multilocus clines in the sea. The geographic width of a stable genetic cline is determined by a balance between the homogenizing effects of dispersal and the diversifying effects of selection. For marine researchers, the power of genetic clines is that, if selection and clinal width are quantified, then the average geographic distances that larvae move can be inferred. Measuring selection or dispersal through laboratory or field-based experimentation is possible, though logistically difficult, for pelagically dispersed organisms. Instead, dispersal may be more robustly quantified from the degree of linkage disequilibrium between two or more loci, because linkage disequilibrium integrates selection across multiple life stages and generations. It is also relatively insensitive to whether exogenous or endogenous selection operates. Even without quantifying linkage disequilibrium, the theory of genetic clines indicates that the average dispersal distance of larvae is a fraction (i.e., generally <35%) of the clinal width. Because cline theory is based on several underlying assumptions, including near-equilibrium between selection and migration, the dispersal distances inferred from empirical data should be of the correct order but may not be precise. Even so, such estimates of larval dispersal are valuable, as they can be utilized to design appropriate scales for future investigations and provide some guidance to conservation efforts.
海洋种群生态学和进化中许多未解决的问题都集中在浮游幼虫远离其亲本的扩散距离上。遗传工具为确定幼虫的空间扩散提供了一种很有前景的方法,但其准确解读取决于遗传位点受选择的程度。遗传渐变群,即基因分化种群杂交的地理区域,为明确且同时量化选择和扩散的相对作用提供了机会。在这里,我们回顾遗传渐变群的理论和分析,并将这些技术应用于已发表的海洋多位点渐变群研究。稳定遗传渐变群的地理宽度由扩散的同质化效应和选择的多样化效应之间的平衡决定。对于海洋研究人员来说,遗传渐变群的作用在于,如果能够量化选择和渐变群宽度,那么就可以推断出幼虫移动的平均地理距离。对于浮游性扩散的生物,通过实验室或实地实验来测量选择或扩散是可行的,尽管在实际操作上有困难。相反,扩散可能可以从两个或更多位点之间的连锁不平衡程度更可靠地量化,因为连锁不平衡整合了多个生命阶段和世代的选择。它对外源或内源选择是否起作用也相对不敏感。即使不量化连锁不平衡,遗传渐变群理论也表明幼虫的平均扩散距离是渐变群宽度的一个分数(即通常<35%)。由于渐变群理论基于几个潜在假设,包括选择和迁移之间接近平衡,从经验数据推断出的扩散距离应该是正确的量级,但可能并不精确。即便如此,这种幼虫扩散的估计仍然很有价值,因为它们可用于设计未来调查的适当尺度,并为保护工作提供一些指导。