Ma Cynthia, Mandrekar Sumithra J, Alberts Steven R, Croghan Gary A, Jatoi Aminah, Reid Joel M, Hanson Lorelei J, Bruzek Laura, Tan Angelina D, Pitot Henry C, Erlichman Charles, Wright John J, Adjei Alex A
Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;59(2):207-15. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0259-9. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
Bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 20S proteasome with activity in a variety of cancers, exhibits sequence-dependent synergistic cytotoxicity with taxanes and platinum agents. Two different treatment schedules of bortezomib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin were tested in this phase I study to evaluate the effects of scheduling on toxicities, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity.
Patients with advanced malignancies were alternately assigned to receive (schedule A) paclitaxel and carboplatin (IV d1) followed by bortezomib (IV d2, d5, d8) or (schedule B) bortezomib (IV d1, d4, d8) followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin (IV d2) on a 21-day cycle.
Fifty-three patients (A 25, B 28) were treated with a median of 3 cycles (range 1-8) for schedule A and 3.5 cycles (range 1-10) for schedule B. Grade 3 or higher treatment related hematologic adverse events in all cycles of treatment included neutropenia (A 52%, B 50%), anemia (A 12%, B 7.1%) and thrombocytopenia (A 16%, B 17.9%). Non-hematologic treatment related adverse events were fairly mild (primarily grades 1 and 2). The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended doses for future phase II trials are bortezomib 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 for schedule A and bortezomib 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 for schedule B. Six (21.4%) partial responses (PR) were seen with schedule B. In contrast, only 1 (4%) PR was achieved with schedule A. Similar proteasome inhibition was achieved at MTD for both schedules.
Administration of sequential bortezomib followed by chemotherapy (schedule B) was well tolerated and associated with an encouraging number of objective responses in this small group of patients. Further studies with this administration schedule are warranted.
硼替佐米是一种20S蛋白酶体的选择性抑制剂,对多种癌症具有活性,与紫杉烷类和铂类药物表现出序列依赖性协同细胞毒性。在这项I期研究中测试了硼替佐米与紫杉醇和卡铂联合使用的两种不同治疗方案,以评估方案安排对毒性、药效学和临床活性的影响。
晚期恶性肿瘤患者被交替分配接受(方案A)紫杉醇和卡铂(静脉注射第1天),随后是硼替佐米(静脉注射第2、5、8天),或(方案B)硼替佐米(静脉注射第1、4、8天),随后是紫杉醇和卡铂(静脉注射第2天),每21天为一个周期。
53例患者(A组25例,B组28例)接受治疗,方案A的中位周期数为3个周期(范围1 - 8),方案B为3.5个周期(范围1 - 10)。所有治疗周期中3级或更高等级的治疗相关血液学不良事件包括中性粒细胞减少(A组52%,B组50%)、贫血(A组12%,B组7.1%)和血小板减少(A组16%,B组17.9%)。非血液学治疗相关不良事件相当轻微(主要为1级和2级)。方案A的最大耐受剂量和未来II期试验推荐剂量为硼替佐米1.2mg/m²、紫杉醇135mg/m²和卡铂AUC = 6,方案B为硼替佐米1.2mg/m²、紫杉醇175mg/m²和卡铂AUC = 6。方案B观察到6例(21.4%)部分缓解(PR)。相比之下,方案A仅实现1例(4%)PR。两种方案在最大耐受剂量时均实现了相似的蛋白酶体抑制。
在这一小部分患者中,先给予硼替佐米后进行化疗(方案B)的给药方式耐受性良好,且有数量可观的客观缓解,值得对该给药方案进行进一步研究。