Suppr超能文献

运动身份及其与运动参与水平的关系。

Athletic identity and its relationship to sport participation levels.

作者信息

Lamont-Mills Andrea, Christensen Steven A

机构信息

Centre for Rural and Remote Area Health, Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, PO Darling Heights, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Dec;9(6):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jun 12.

Abstract

This study looked at the relationship between athletic identity and three levels of sport participation (elite, recreational, non-participation). Athletic identity was measured using the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) with participants being compared on the total AIMS score and scores on its three factors (social identity, exclusivity, negative affectivity). Results indicated that the male non-participation group scored lower on all three factors and the total AIMS when compared to the two athlete groups. The male elite and recreational groups did not differ on exclusivity and negative affectivity but did differ on the total AIMS and social identity, with elite scoring higher than recreational. For female participants, the non-participation group again scored lower on all three factors and the total AIMS when compared to the two athlete groups. The female elite and recreational groups did not differ on negative affectivity but did differ on the total AIMS, social identity, and exclusivity, with elite scoring higher than recreational. Findings suggest that to assume sport is only important to elite athletes ignores the role that sport may play for less talented sport participants. Whilst not seeing themselves as athletes per se, it is suggested that participation in sport may still impact upon the self-perceptions of recreational sport participants. Therefore, threats to participation may result in similar negative consequences for both elite athletes and recreational sport participants.

摘要

本研究探讨了运动身份与三个运动参与水平(精英、休闲、不参与)之间的关系。使用运动身份测量量表(AIMS)来测量运动身份,对参与者的AIMS总分及其三个因素(社会身份、排他性、消极情感)得分进行比较。结果表明,与两个运动员组相比,男性不参与组在所有三个因素以及AIMS总分上得分更低。男性精英组和休闲组在排他性和消极情感方面没有差异,但在AIMS总分和社会身份方面存在差异,精英组得分高于休闲组。对于女性参与者,与两个运动员组相比,不参与组在所有三个因素以及AIMS总分上再次得分更低。女性精英组和休闲组在消极情感方面没有差异,但在AIMS总分、社会身份和排他性方面存在差异,精英组得分高于休闲组。研究结果表明,认为运动只对精英运动员重要的观点忽略了运动对天赋稍逊的运动参与者可能发挥的作用。虽然休闲运动参与者本身并不将自己视为运动员,但参与运动仍可能影响他们的自我认知。因此,参与运动受到的威胁可能会给精英运动员和休闲运动参与者带来类似的负面后果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验