Gruss Eyal
Israeli Ministry of Defense, Israel.
J Trauma. 2006 Jun;60(6):1284-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000220015.21948.ec.
We review the accepted primary blast injury criteria. We point out a significant systematic error in the criteria due to the use of low-quality pulse duration data in the original criteria.
We recalculate the injury criteria using state-of-the-art blast data.
We give the corrected injury criteria in the form of pressure-duration curves, pressure-impulse curves and charge weight-range curves.
We discuss the practical implications of a naive use of the accepted criteria in the various forms. In general, the criteria based on pulse duration are seen to be over conservative, while the criteria based on impulse are seen to be too liberal.
我们回顾了公认的原发性爆震伤标准。我们指出，由于原始标准中使用了低质量的脉冲持续时间数据，该标准存在重大的系统误差。
我们使用最新的爆震数据重新计算损伤标准。
我们以压力-持续时间曲线、压力-冲量曲线和装药重量-范围曲线的形式给出了修正后的损伤标准。
我们讨论了不加区分地使用各种形式的公认标准的实际影响。一般来说，基于脉冲持续时间的标准过于保守，而基于冲量的标准则过于宽松。
