Suppr超能文献

吉西他滨与氟尿嘧啶脂质体方案动脉内给药治疗不可切除胰腺癌患者的随机试验。

Randomised trial of gemcitabine versus flec regimen given intra-arterially for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

Cantore M, Fiorentini G, Luppi G, Rosati G, Caudana R, Piazza E, Comella G, Ceravolo C, Miserocchi L, Mambrini A, Del Freo A, Zamagni D, Aitini E, Marangolo M

机构信息

Oncological Department, USL 1, Massa e Carrara, Empoli.

出版信息

J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Dec;22(4 Suppl):51-7.

Abstract

Gemcitabine is considered the golden standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intra-arte-rial drug administration had shown a deep rationale with some interesting results. In a multicenter phase III trial, we compared gemcitabine given weekly with a combination of 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, carboplatin (FLEC) administered intra-arteriously as first-line therapy in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks or 5-fluoruracil 1,000 mg/m2, leucovorin 100 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 infused bolus intra-arteriously at three-weekly interval for 3 times. The primary end point was overall survival, while time to treatment failure, response rate, clinical benefit response were secondary endpoints. Sixty-seven patients were randomly allocated gemcitabine and 71 were allocated FLEC intra-arterially. Patients treated with FLEC lived for significantly longer than patients on gemcitabine (p=.036). Survival at 1 year was increased from 21% in the gemcitabine group to 35% in the FLEC group. Median survival was 7.9 months in the FLEC group and 5.8 months in the gemcitabine group. Median time to treatment failure was longer with FLEC (5.3 vs 4.2 months for FLEC vs gemcitabine respectively; p=.013). Clinical benefit was similar in both groups (17.9% for gemcitabine and 26.7% for FLEC; p=NS). CT-scan partial response was similar in both group (5.9% for gemcitabine and 14% for FLEC; p=NS). Toxicity profiles were different. Compared with gemcitabine, FLEC regimen given intra-arteriously, improved survival in patient with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

摘要

吉西他滨被认为是不可切除胰腺癌的金标准治疗方法。动脉内给药已显示出深刻的理论依据并取得了一些有趣的结果。在一项多中心III期试验中,我们比较了每周给予吉西他滨与动脉内给予5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、表柔比星、卡铂(FLEC)联合方案作为不可切除胰腺癌的一线治疗。患者被随机分配接受吉西他滨,剂量为1000mg/m²,静脉滴注30分钟,每周1次,共7周,随后休息1周,然后每4周每周1次,共3周;或5-氟尿嘧啶1000mg/m²、亚叶酸钙100mg/m²、表柔比星60mg/m²、卡铂300mg/m²,动脉内推注,每3周1次,共3次。主要终点是总生存期,而治疗失败时间、缓解率、临床获益反应为次要终点。67例患者被随机分配接受吉西他滨治疗,71例患者被分配接受动脉内FLEC治疗。接受FLEC治疗的患者生存时间明显长于接受吉西他滨治疗的患者(p = 0.036)。1年生存率从吉西他滨组的21%提高到FLEC组的35%。FLEC组的中位生存期为7.9个月,吉西他滨组为5.8个月。FLEC组的中位治疗失败时间更长(FLEC组与吉西他滨组分别为5.3个月和4.2个月;p = 0.013)。两组的临床获益相似(吉西他滨组为17.9%,FLEC组为26.7%;p = 无统计学意义)。CT扫描部分缓解在两组中相似(吉西他滨组为5.9%,FLEC组为14%;p = 无统计学意义)。毒性反应情况不同。与吉西他滨相比,动脉内给予FLEC方案可提高不可切除胰腺癌患者的生存率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验