Suppr超能文献

急性完全性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:喙锁螺钉固定联合张力带钢丝或韧带转移的比较

Surgical treatment of acute complete acromioclavicular dislocation: comparison of coracoclavicular screw fixation supplemented with tension band wiring or ligament transfer.

作者信息

Lin Wei-Ching, Wu Chi-Chuan, Su Chun-Yi, Fan Kuo-Feng, Tseng I-Chuan, Chiu Yi-Lee

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Chang Gung Med J. 2006 Mar-Apr;29(2):182-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acute complete acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation is still controversial. Both non-surgical and surgical methods have been reported with similar results. In addition, once surgical treatment is chosen, a satisfactory surgical technique has not been developed yet.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients who sustained 60 acute complete AC dislocations were treated using coracoclavicular (CC) screw fixation supplemented with tension band wiring for the AC joint (n = 30) or coracoacromial (CA) ligament reconstruction (n = 30), respectively. The operating times, functional outcomes, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with tension band wiring (group 1) and 27 patients with CA ligament reconstruction (group 2) were followed-up for 12-47 (mean, 23.6) months. The operating time was 34-57 (mean, 46.3) minutes in group 1 verse 52-93 (mean, 83.4) minutes in group 2 (p < 0.001). The percentage of satisfactory outcomes was 86.2% in group 1 verse 88.9% in group 2 (p = 0.30). Loss of reduction of the AC joint was 13.8 % (4/29) in group 1 verse 3.7% in group 2 (1/27, p = 0.17). Patients who received tension band wiring treatment had a higher rate of unsatisfactory outcomes when loss of reduction of the AC joint occurred (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Once surgical methods are chosen in patients with acute complete AC dislocation, CC screw fixation supplemented with tension band wiring for the AC joint or CA ligament reconstruction achieved similar satisfactory rates. However, patients who received the former had relatively shorter operating times.

摘要

背景

急性完全性肩锁关节(AC)脱位的治疗仍存在争议。非手术和手术方法均有报道,且结果相似。此外,一旦选择手术治疗,尚未开发出令人满意的手术技术。

方法

连续60例急性完全性AC脱位患者分别采用喙锁(CC)螺钉固定并辅以AC关节张力带钢丝固定(n = 30)或喙肩(CA)韧带重建(n = 30)进行治疗。比较手术时间、功能结果和并发症。

结果

29例接受张力带钢丝固定的患者(第1组)和27例接受CA韧带重建的患者(第2组)随访了12 - 47个月(平均23.6个月)。第1组的手术时间为34 - 57分钟(平均46.3分钟),第2组为52 - 93分钟(平均83.4分钟)(p < 0.001)。第1组的满意结果百分比为86.2%,第2组为88.9%(p = 0.30)。AC关节复位丢失率在第1组为13.8%(4/29),第2组为3.7%(1/27,p = 0.17)。当AC关节复位丢失时,接受张力带钢丝固定治疗的患者不满意结果发生率较高(p = 0.01)。

结论

对于急性完全性AC脱位患者,一旦选择手术方法,AC关节CC螺钉固定辅以张力带钢丝固定或CA韧带重建的满意率相似。然而,接受前者治疗的患者手术时间相对较短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验