Suppr超能文献

选择性注意与威胁:快速定向与缓慢脱离以及点探测任务的两个版本

Selective attention and threat: quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task.

作者信息

Salemink Elske, van den Hout Marcel A, Kindt Merel

机构信息

Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2007 Mar;45(3):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.04.004.

Abstract

The dot probe task is often used to assess attentional bias in anxiety, but some aspects need clarification. First, the results, which are traditionally summarized in an attentional bias index, do not allow for distinguishing between different selective attention processes; orienting and disengagement. Second, different versions of the dot probe task have been used with unknown relative merits. Participants (N=133) completed two versions of the dot probe task: the detection task (i.e. is there a probe?) and the differentiation task (i.e. what sort of probe is it?). The analysis carried out allowed for a differentiation between orienting and disengagement. The main finding was that trait anxiety is related to disengagement difficulties and not to speed of orienting. Concerning the relative merits of the two dot probe task versions, the results suggest that the detection task may be superior to the differentiation task. Implications for past and future research are discussed.

摘要

点探测任务常用于评估焦虑中的注意偏向,但有些方面需要澄清。首先,传统上用注意偏向指数总结的结果无法区分不同的选择性注意过程:定向和脱离。其次,不同版本的点探测任务被使用,但其相对优点未知。参与者(N = 133)完成了两个版本的点探测任务:检测任务(即有探测刺激吗?)和辨别任务(即它是什么类型的探测刺激?)。进行的分析能够区分定向和脱离。主要发现是特质焦虑与脱离困难有关,而与定向速度无关。关于两个点探测任务版本的相对优点,结果表明检测任务可能优于辨别任务。讨论了对过去和未来研究的启示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验