Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
作者信息
Lindsay Ronald A
出版信息
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Mar;16(1):99-104. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0004.
PMID:16770893
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Mar;16(1):99-104. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0004.
2
The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web. 2006 Jan 19:A22.
3
Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
N Y Times Web. 2006 Jan 18:A1, A16.
4
Justices accept case weighing assisted suicide.法官受理权衡协助自杀的案件。
N Y Times Web. 2005 Feb 23:A1, A14.
5
6
Not DEA'd yet: Gonzales v. Oregon.尚未被美国药品管理局取缔：冈萨雷斯诉俄勒冈州案
Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Mar-Apr;36(2):8. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2006.0018.
7
The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: a successful model or a legal anomaly vulnerable to attack?《俄勒冈尊严死亡法案》：一个成功的模式还是一个易受攻击的法律异常现象？
Houst Law Rev. 2004 Spring;40(5):1387-421.
8
Fraught issue, but narrow ruling in Oregon suicide case.
N Y Times Web. 2006 Jan 18:A16.
9
Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.大法官们探讨美国对各州协助自杀行为的管辖权。
N Y Times Web. 2005 Oct 6:A1, A32.
10
Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9;354(10):1079-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim060731.
Zotero 插件