Browne Gina, Roberts Jacqueline, Gafni Amiram, Byrne Carolyn, Kertyzia June, Loney Patricia
System Linked Research Unit (SLRU) on Health and Social Service Utilization, School of Nursing, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, (CE&B) McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e03. doi: 10.5334/ijic.98. Epub 2004 May 19.
This paper proposes both a model and a measure of human service integration through strategic alliances with autonomous services as one way to achieve comprehensive health and social services for target populations.
Diverse theories of integrated service delivery and collaboration were combined reflecting integration along a continuum of care within a service sector, across service sectors and between public, not-for-profit and private sectors of financing services.
A measure of human service integration is proposed and tested. The measure identifies the scope and depth of integration for each sector and service that make up a total service network. It captures in quantitative terms both intra and inter sectoral service integration.
Results are provided using the Human Service Measure in two networks of services involved in promoting Healthy Babies and Healthy Children known to have more and less integration.
The instrument demonstrated discriminate validity with scores correctly distinguishing the two networks. The instrument does not correlate (r=0.13) with Weiss (2001) measure of partnership synergy confirming that it measures a distinct component of integration.
We recommend the combined use of the proposed measure and the Weiss (2001) measure to more completely capture the scope and depth of integration efforts as well as the nature of the functioning of a service program or network.
本文提出了一种通过与自主服务建立战略联盟来实现人类服务整合的模型和衡量方法,作为为目标人群提供全面健康和社会服务的一种方式。
综合了多种关于综合服务提供与协作的理论,反映了在一个服务部门内、跨服务部门以及在公共、非营利和私营融资服务部门之间沿着连续护理过程的整合。
提出并测试了一种人类服务整合的衡量方法。该衡量方法确定了构成整个服务网络的每个部门和服务的整合范围与深度。它以定量方式体现了部门内和部门间的服务整合情况。
使用人类服务衡量方法在两个促进健康婴儿和健康儿童的服务网络中给出了结果,已知这两个网络的整合程度有高有低。
该工具显示出区分效度,分数能够正确区分这两个网络。该工具与韦斯(2001年)的伙伴关系协同效应衡量方法不相关(r = 0.13),证实它衡量的是整合的一个独特组成部分。
我们建议结合使用所提出的衡量方法和韦斯(2001年)的衡量方法,以更全面地把握整合工作的范围与深度以及服务项目或网络的运作性质。