McNally L M, Barbour M E, O'Sullivan D J, Jagger D C
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Department of Oral and Dental Science, University of Bristol, Bristol Dental School and Hospital, Bristol, UK.
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Jul;33(7):529-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01577.x.
The sale of over-the-counter pain relief medication has increased dramatically in recent years, and typically amounts to several hundred thousands of pounds per year in the UK. Many soluble analgesic preparations contain citric acid, and it has been suggested that these formulations may cause dental erosion. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of some over-the-counter analgesics on tooth surface loss from human enamel. Six commonly available analgesics were chosen for this study and the effect of immersing unerupted human enamel was examined using non-contact optical profilometry. Two of the six analgesics investigated caused no detectable erosion (Boots soluble aspirin and Anadin Extra). Three caused statistically significant enamel erosion, but this was very slight and is thought to be clinically insignificant (Alka Seltzer, Panadol and Solpadeine). Only one analgesic caused possible potentially clinical significant enamel erosion. Further studies are needed to determine whether Aspro causes clinically significant enamel erosion.
近年来,非处方止痛药物的销量急剧增长,在英国每年通常可达数十万英镑。许多可溶性止痛制剂含有柠檬酸,有人认为这些制剂可能会导致牙齿侵蚀。本研究的目的是调查一些非处方止痛药对人类牙釉质牙齿表面流失的影响。本研究选择了六种常见的止痛药,并使用非接触式光学轮廓仪检查了浸泡未萌出人类牙釉质的效果。所研究的六种止痛药中有两种未造成可检测到的侵蚀(博姿可溶性阿司匹林和安乃近Extra)。三种药物导致了具有统计学意义的牙釉质侵蚀,但程度非常轻微,被认为在临床上无显著意义(泡腾片、必理通和索密痛)。只有一种止痛药可能导致具有潜在临床意义的牙釉质侵蚀。需要进一步研究以确定阿斯普是否会导致具有临床意义的牙釉质侵蚀。