Jemt Torsten, Johansson Jesper
Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(2):61-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x.
Few long-term follow-up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.
The aim of this study was to report 15-year patient-based data in relation to time of follow up after treatment with fixed prostheses supported by implants in the edentulous upper jaw.
Seventy-six edentulous consecutive patients, provided with 450 turned Brånemark implants, were followed up with regard to maintenance, complications, and radiographs taken during the follow-up period.
Forty-four patients provided with 247 implants were lost to follow up. Patients followed up for 15 years showed as a group a trend of better implant survival than patients lost to follow up (p > .05). Altogether, 37 implants and 5 fixed prostheses failed during the follow-up period. Most implants were lost at abutment surgery (n- 15) and another nine during the first year of function. The 15-year implant and fixed prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 90.9 and 90.6%, respectively. Resin veneer fractures caused most problems, more frequent in the earlier stage while severe wear increased in the later stage of follow up. No implant fractures or loosening of abutment/bridge locking screws were noted. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm (SD 0.47) after 5 years, followed by only minimal average changes during the following years. No radiographic parameter showed any time-dependent relationship. The percentage of patients presenting at least one implant with more than 2.0-mm bone loss was 4.9% in the interval from 0 to 5 years and 4.0% between 10 and 15 years. Only 1.3% of implants showed >3.0 mm accumulated bone loss after 15 years.
Implant treatment in the edentulous upper jaw functions well in a 15-year time perspective, but an insignificant trend of higher implant failures was observed for patients lost to follow up. Besides wear and fractures of veneers, no other parameter showed any time-related relationship, indicating an increased risk for more complications during later stages of follow up. However, accumulation of smaller amount of bone loss during the years resulted in an increasing number of implants and patients with bone levels below the third thread, which could be speculated to increase future maintenance after 15 years.
基于与时间相关的患者层面数据的种植治疗长期随访研究较少。
本研究的目的是报告在上颌无牙颌患者中,使用种植体支持的固定义齿治疗后15年基于患者的随访时间相关数据。
对76例连续的无牙颌患者进行随访,这些患者共植入了450颗机加工的Brånemark种植体,随访内容包括维护情况、并发症以及随访期间拍摄的X线片。
44例患者的247颗种植体失访。随访15年的患者组种植体生存率总体上比失访患者有更好的趋势(p>.05)。在随访期间,共有37颗种植体和5个固定义齿失败。大多数种植体在基台手术时丢失(n = 15),另外9颗在功能第一年丢失。15年种植体和固定义齿的累积生存率分别为90.9%和90.6%。树脂贴面骨折引起的问题最多,在随访早期更频繁,而在随访后期严重磨损增加。未发现种植体骨折或基台/桥接锁定螺钉松动。5年后平均边缘骨吸收为0.5mm(标准差0.47),在随后几年仅出现极小的平均变化。没有影像学参数显示出任何与时间相关的关系。在0至5年期间,至少有一颗种植体骨吸收超过2.0mm的患者百分比为4.9%,在10至15年期间为4.0%。15年后只有1.3%的种植体累积骨吸收>3.0mm。
从上颌无牙颌患者15年的随访情况来看,种植治疗效果良好,但失访患者的种植体失败率有不显著的升高趋势。除了贴面磨损和骨折外,没有其他参数显示出与时间相关的关系,这表明在随访后期出现更多并发症的风险增加。然而,多年来少量骨吸收的累积导致种植体和骨水平低于第三螺纹的患者数量增加,可以推测这会增加15年后未来维护的需求。