• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of the 2005 Coroners Rules Amendments: a survey of practice in England and Wales.《2005年死因裁判官规则修正案》的实施情况:英格兰和威尔士的实践调查
J Clin Pathol. 2007 Apr;60(4):419-21. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.036178. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
2
Death certification: do consultant pathologists do it better?死亡证明:顾问病理学家做得更好吗?
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Oct;65(10):949-51. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200840. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
3
Local variations in reporting deaths to the coroner in England and Wales: a postcode lottery?英格兰和威尔士向验尸官报告死亡的地方差异:邮政编码的彩票?
J Clin Pathol. 2013 Nov;66(11):933-6. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201640. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
4
Reforming the coroner's service.改革验尸官服务。
BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):175-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.175.
5
Medicolegal postmortem examinations in rural New South Wales. Another rural health problem.
Med J Aust. 1994 Sep 19;161(6):366-8.
6
When should a coroner's inquest be held? The Manchester guidelines for pathologists.何时应进行死因裁判官审讯?病理学家的曼彻斯特指南。
J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jun;54(6):495. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.6.495.
7
General practitioner's knowledge of when to refer deaths to a coroner.全科医生关于何时将死亡案例提交给验尸官的知识。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Apr;45(393):191-3.
8
[Decline in hospital autopsies].[医院尸检数量的下降]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Nov 1;127(21):2800-2.
9
[Care for body materials obtained from autopsy].[对尸检获取的身体材料的护理]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Feb 24;145(8):378-80.
10
What is a natural cause of death? A survey of how coroners in England and Wales approach borderline cases.什么是自然死亡原因?关于英格兰和威尔士验尸官如何处理边缘案例的一项调查。
J Clin Pathol. 2000 May;53(5):367-73. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.5.367.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review.临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异以及尸检组织学的价值;一项荟萃分析与综述
Histopathology. 2005 Dec;47(6):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02243.x.
2
Who to report to the coroner? A survey of intensive care unit directors and Her Majesty's Coroners in England and Wales.应向验尸官报告哪些情况?对英格兰和威尔士重症监护病房主任及女王陛下验尸官的一项调查。
Anaesthesia. 2003 Dec;58(12):1204-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03445.x.
3
What is a natural cause of death? A survey of how coroners in England and Wales approach borderline cases.什么是自然死亡原因?关于英格兰和威尔士验尸官如何处理边缘案例的一项调查。
J Clin Pathol. 2000 May;53(5):367-73. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.5.367.
4
The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房中生前诊断与死后检查结果的关系。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Feb;27(2):299-303. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199902000-00035.
5
Prospective study of the value of necropsy examination in early death after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后早期死亡尸检检查价值的前瞻性研究。
Heart. 1997 Jul;78(1):34-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.1.34.

《2005年死因裁判官规则修正案》的实施情况:英格兰和威尔士的实践调查

Implementation of the 2005 Coroners Rules Amendments: a survey of practice in England and Wales.

作者信息

Delaney Russell J, Roberts Ian S D

机构信息

Forensic Pathology Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 2007 Apr;60(4):419-21. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.036178. Epub 2006 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1136/jcp.2005.036178
PMID:16775122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2001105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On 1 June 2005, amendments to the Coroners Rules 1984 were introduced in England and Wales. These principally cover the retention of tissues from autopsies and their subsequent disposal. This study assesses regional variations in the interpretations of the amendments, and their impact on local autopsy practice in Oxford.

METHODS

A questionnaire was circulated to pathologists in 120 coronial jurisdictions, addressing conditions under which histological material could be retained. A local review of autopsy practice was conducted before and after the introduction of the amendments.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were returned from 71 coronial jurisdictions. 35 (49%) coroners provided written guidelines on their interpretation of the amendments. In 52 (73%) jurisdictions, pathologists are authorised to retain material to confirm/refine causes of death from natural causes. In 77% of jurisdictions, coroner's officers are responsible for obtaining instructions from the next of kin on subsequent retention, use or disposal of retained tissues. In Oxford, there has been a reduction in the proportion of cases in which histology is taken, but an increase in the proportion of cases in which a histology report is issued.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable regional variation in the interpretation of the 2005 Coroners Rules Amendments. These variations have potentially important implications for clinical practice.

摘要

背景

2005年6月1日,英格兰和威尔士对1984年《死因裁判官规则》进行了修订。这些修订主要涉及尸检组织的留存及其后续处理。本研究评估了对这些修订的解释在地区上的差异,以及它们对牛津当地尸检实践的影响。

方法

向120个死因裁判辖区的病理学家发放了一份问卷,涉及可留存组织学材料的条件。在修订引入前后,对尸检实践进行了本地审查。

结果

收到了来自71个死因裁判辖区的问卷回复。35名(49%)死因裁判官就他们对修订的解释提供了书面指导方针。在52个(73%)辖区,病理学家被授权留存材料以确认/完善自然死亡原因。在77%的辖区,死因裁判官的官员负责就留存组织的后续留存、使用或处理事宜获取近亲的指示。在牛津,进行组织学检查的病例比例有所下降,但出具组织学报告的病例比例有所上升。

结论

对2005年《死因裁判官规则修订案》的解释在地区上存在相当大的差异。这些差异对临床实践可能具有重要意义。