Baleani Massimiliano, Ohman Caroline, Guandalini Luciano, Rotini Roberto, Giavaresi Gianluca, Traina Francesco, Viceconti Marco
Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna 40136, Italy.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Oct;21(8):799-803. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
One cause of early failure of rotator cuff repairs is the pull out of the suture through the tendon. The aims of this study were to investigate the initial strength and failure mode of different tendon grasping techniques and to evaluate an alternative stitch proposed for arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tendons.
Four different stitches were investigated: simple stitch, Mattress, modified Mason-Allen and simple stitch closed over a horizontal loop. The last stitch was proposed as an alternative to the modified Mason-Allen stitch since the former is simpler to sew arthroscopically than the latter. The experimental procedure was designed to assess the mechanical behaviour of the stitches. Tests were performed using sheep infraspinatus tendons. Two different non-absorbable sutures were used. Each specimen was preloaded with about 30 N and then loaded to failure.
No significant difference was found in compliance among the four investigated stitches. Conversely, the tensile strength of the simple stitch and Mattress was lower than the tensile strength of the other two stitches, while no significant difference was observed between the modified Mason-Allen and the simple stitch closed over a horizontal loop. The maximum grasping power of these two 'reinforced' stitches was achieved only with the high-strength suture.
The simple stitch closed over a horizontal loop seems to be an attractive alternative to the modified Mason-Allen for arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff and it seems recommendable instead of simple or Mattress stitches. The use of a high-strength suture would increase the tensile strength of the grasping in the case of good quality tendon tissue.
肩袖修复早期失败的一个原因是缝线从肌腱中拔出。本研究的目的是调查不同肌腱抓持技术的初始强度和失效模式,并评估一种为关节镜下肩袖肌腱修复提出的替代缝合方法。
研究了四种不同的缝合方法:单纯缝合、褥式缝合、改良梅森-艾伦缝合和在水平环上闭合的单纯缝合。最后一种缝合方法被提出作为改良梅森-艾伦缝合的替代方法,因为前者在关节镜下比后者更容易缝合。实验程序旨在评估缝合方法的力学行为。使用绵羊冈下肌腱进行测试。使用了两种不同的不可吸收缝线。每个标本先预加载约30N,然后加载至失效。
在所研究的四种缝合方法中,顺应性没有显著差异。相反,单纯缝合和褥式缝合的拉伸强度低于其他两种缝合方法的拉伸强度,而改良梅森-艾伦缝合和在水平环上闭合的单纯缝合之间没有观察到显著差异。这两种“加强”缝合方法的最大抓持力仅在使用高强度缝线时才能实现。
在关节镜下肩袖修复中,在水平环上闭合的单纯缝合似乎是改良梅森-艾伦缝合的一个有吸引力的替代方法,并且似乎比单纯或褥式缝合更值得推荐。在肌腱组织质量良好的情况下,使用高强度缝线会增加抓持的拉伸强度。