Larach D R, Hensley F A, Martin D E, High K M, Rung G W, Skeehan T M
Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey 17033.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1991 Apr;5(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(91)90323-l.
The hemodynamic effects of three nondepolarizing skeletal muscle relaxant drug regimens were compared during the induction of general anesthesia in 64 patients with valvular heart disease using a double-blind protocol. Patients were first stratified according to primary valvular defect (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, or mitral regurgitation). Next, patients were randomly allocated to a drug group, either group A (atracurium), group V (vecuronium), or group MP (metocurine plus pancuronium). Data were collected during three periods: awake, postanesthetic induction, and posttracheal intubation. Four cardiovascular variables were designated a priori as primary variables of interest. These were heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI). Patients with mitral stenosis showed two significant hemodynamic differences among muscle relaxant drug groups: (1) CI increased in group A but decreased in group MP between the awake and postinduction measurements (P = 0.032); and (2) SVRI decreased in group A but increased in group MP between the awake and postintubation periods (P = 0.034). In contrast, patients with aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, or mitral regurgitation demonstrated no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular responses among drug groups. Further analysis was performed using the following data: (1) other hemodynamic variables; (2) incidence of deviations from cardiovascular stability; and (3) the frequency of cardiovascular drug use. This examination showed no important differences among the muscle relaxant drug groups. The small but significant hemodynamic changes observed in mitral stenosis patients in drug groups A and MP were not noted with vecuronium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用双盲方案,比较了64例瓣膜性心脏病患者在全身麻醉诱导期间三种非去极化骨骼肌松弛药方案的血流动力学效应。患者首先根据原发性瓣膜缺损(主动脉狭窄、主动脉反流、二尖瓣狭窄或二尖瓣反流)进行分层。接下来,将患者随机分配到药物组,即A组(阿曲库铵)、V组(维库溴铵)或MP组(美索曲明加泮库溴铵)。在三个时期收集数据:清醒期、麻醉诱导后和气管插管后。预先指定四个心血管变量为主要关注变量。这些变量是心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心脏指数(CI)和全身血管阻力指数(SVRI)。二尖瓣狭窄患者在肌肉松弛药组之间表现出两个显著的血流动力学差异:(1)在清醒和诱导后测量之间,A组CI升高而MP组CI降低(P = 0.032);(2)在清醒和插管后时期之间,A组SVRI降低而MP组SVRI升高(P = 0.034)。相比之下,主动脉狭窄、主动脉反流或二尖瓣反流患者在药物组之间的心血管反应没有统计学上的显著差异。使用以下数据进行了进一步分析:(1)其他血流动力学变量;(2)心血管稳定性偏差的发生率;(3)心血管药物使用频率。这项检查显示肌肉松弛药组之间没有重要差异。在A组和MP组的二尖瓣狭窄患者中观察到的微小但显著的血流动力学变化在维库溴铵组中未观察到。(摘要截断于250字)