Kharod Bhairavi V, Johnson Paul B, Nesti Heather A, Rhee Douglas J
William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Glaucoma. 2006 Jun;15(3):244-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212213.18018.8f.
Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reporting of the prescribed medication regimen in a glaucoma population, identify contributing factors, and assess the effect of written instructions.
All patients at an urban resident glaucoma clinic were offered participation in this prospective, case-controlled study. Two trained interviewers administered a confidential questionnaire consisting of six questions regarding the name and dosage of ophthalmic medications, education level, ability to read, and age. A verbatim response for each question was recorded on the questionnaire. At the end of the visit, patients were given a written chart describing their ophthalmic medications, frequency, and dosage. At their next scheduled visit, the same questionnaire was repeated. The patients' responses from both visits were compared with the regimen they were prescribed and with each other. This information was used to determine the accuracy of reporting medications.
A total of 193 patients were enrolled in the study over a 10-month period; 164 patients completed both phases (85% completion rate). The study population consisted of 85 women and 79 men with a mean age of 68.40+/-11.6 years. Eighty-four patients had attained less than 12th grade education and 80 had completed high school. At the first visit, 66 patients (40%) showed less than 100% accuracy. Forty-nine of 84 (58%) patients who had not completed high school education showed less than 100% accuracy with a mean score of 65% (P=0.001), whereas 17 of 80 (21%) of patients who had completed high school showed less than 100% accuracy with a mean score of 87% (P=0.001). After written instruction, the accuracy of reporting improved by 23.36+/-30.8 percentile points in patients without completion of high school education and improved by 8.46+/-21.7 percentile points in patients who had completed high school (P<0.001). The mean number of ophthalmic medications prescribed was 2.10+/-0.93 (range 1 to 4). Patients on one medication had 100% accuracy in reporting 82% of the time, whereas those with four medications had 100% accuracy 21% of the time. Gender, age, and race of the patient were not correlated with the accuracy of self-reporting (P>0.05).
The education level of the patient and the number of medications showed direct correlation with patients' ability to report medications accurately. Patients showed improvement in accuracy of reporting medications when given written instructions about their regimen, regardless of their level of education or number of medications.
我们的目的是评估青光眼患者群体中自我报告规定药物治疗方案的准确性,确定相关因素,并评估书面说明的效果。
城市居民青光眼诊所的所有患者均受邀参与这项前瞻性病例对照研究。两名经过培训的访谈者发放一份保密问卷,其中包含六个关于眼科药物名称和剂量、教育程度、阅读能力及年龄的问题。问卷上记录每个问题的逐字回答。就诊结束时,为患者提供一份描述其眼科药物、用药频率和剂量的书面图表。在他们下次预定就诊时,重复发放相同问卷。将患者两次就诊的回答与他们所规定的治疗方案以及相互之间的回答进行比较。这些信息用于确定报告药物的准确性。
在10个月期间,共有193名患者纳入研究;164名患者完成了两个阶段(完成率85%)。研究人群包括85名女性和79名男性,平均年龄为68.40±11.6岁。84名患者的教育程度低于12年级,80名患者完成了高中学业。在首次就诊时,66名患者(40%)的回答准确率低于100%。84名未完成高中学业的患者中有49名(58%)回答准确率低于100%,平均得分为65%(P=0.001),而80名完成高中学业的患者中有17名(21%)回答准确率低于100%,平均得分为87%(P=0.001)。给予书面说明后,未完成高中学业的患者报告准确率提高了23.36±30.8个百分点,完成高中学业的患者报告准确率提高了8.46±21.7个百分点(P<0.001)。规定的眼科药物平均数量为2.10±0.93(范围1至4)。服用一种药物的患者在82%的时间里报告准确率为100%,而服用四种药物的患者在21%的时间里报告准确率为100%。患者的性别、年龄和种族与自我报告的准确率无关(P>0.05)。
患者的教育程度和药物数量与患者准确报告药物的能力直接相关。无论教育程度或药物数量如何,当给予患者关于其治疗方案的书面说明时,患者报告药物的准确率均有所提高。