• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测社区获得性肺炎患者预后的个体化模型。

Patient-specific models for predicting the outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Visweswaran Shyam, Cooper Gregory F

机构信息

Center for Biomedical Informatics and the Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:759-63.

PMID:16779142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560580/
Abstract

We investigated two patient-specific and four population-wide machine learning methods for predicting dire outcomes in community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients. Predicting dire outcomes in CAP patients can significantly influence the decision about whether to admit the patient to the hospital or to treat the patient at home. Population-wide methods induce models that are trained to perform well on average on all future cases. In contrast, patient-specific methods specifically induce a model for a particular patient case. We trained the models on a set of 1601 patient cases and evaluated them on a separate set of 686 cases. One patient-specific method performed better than the population-wide methods when evaluated within a clinically relevant range of the ROC curve. Our study provides support for patient-specific methods being a promising approach for making clinical predictions.

摘要

我们研究了两种针对特定患者的机器学习方法和四种针对全体人群的机器学习方法,用于预测社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的严重后果。预测CAP患者的严重后果会显著影响关于是否将患者收治入院或在家治疗的决策。针对全体人群的方法所生成的模型,是经过训练以在所有未来病例上平均表现良好。相比之下,针对特定患者的方法则专门为特定患者病例生成一个模型。我们在一组1601例患者病例上训练这些模型,并在另一组686例病例上对其进行评估。当在ROC曲线的临床相关范围内进行评估时,一种针对特定患者的方法比针对全体人群的方法表现更好。我们的研究为针对特定患者的方法作为一种有前景的临床预测方法提供了支持。

相似文献

1
Patient-specific models for predicting the outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia.用于预测社区获得性肺炎患者预后的个体化模型。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:759-63.
2
Predicting dire outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia.预测社区获得性肺炎患者的严重后果。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):347-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.005. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
3
Automatic identification of patients eligible for a pneumonia guideline: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two decision support models.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):493-7.
4
An evaluation of machine-learning methods for predicting pneumonia mortality.
Artif Intell Med. 1997 Feb;9(2):107-38. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(96)00367-3.
5
Prediction of community-acquired pneumonia using artificial neural networks.使用人工神经网络预测社区获得性肺炎
Med Decis Making. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2):112-21. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03251247.
6
Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.机器学习在前列腺癌病理分期中的应用:一系列分类器的性能比较。
Artif Intell Med. 2012 May;55(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
7
Selection of predictor variables for pneumonia using neural networks and genetic algorithms.使用神经网络和遗传算法选择肺炎的预测变量。
Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(1):89-97.
8
Predicting carcinoid heart disease with the noisy-threshold classifier.使用噪声阈值分类器预测类癌性心脏病。
Artif Intell Med. 2007 May;40(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
Prognostic value of plasma human β-defensin 2 level on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a preliminary study.血浆人β-防御素 2 水平对社区获得性肺炎患者短期临床结局的预测价值:一项初步研究。
Respir Care. 2013 Apr;58(4):655-61. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01827.
10
The use of physician domain knowledge to improve the learning of rule-based models for decision-support.利用医生领域知识来改进基于规则的决策支持模型的学习。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:192-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of machine learning based models to predict the severity of community acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients: A systematic review.使用基于机器学习的模型预测住院患者社区获得性肺炎的严重程度:一项系统评价。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Feb 3;26(2):237-248. doi: 10.1177/17511437251315319. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Evaluation of the Need for Intensive Care in Children With Pneumonia: Machine Learning Approach.肺炎患儿重症监护需求评估:机器学习方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e28934. doi: 10.2196/28934.
3
Machine learning in orthopaedic surgery.骨科手术中的机器学习。
World J Orthop. 2021 Sep 18;12(9):685-699. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i9.685.
4
Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床预测模型:系统研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 6;22(10):e21439. doi: 10.2196/21439.
5
Systematic discovery of the functional impact of somatic genome alterations in individual tumors through tumor-specific causal inference.通过肿瘤特异性因果推断,在个体肿瘤中系统地发现体细胞基因组改变的功能影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jul 5;15(7):e1007088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007088. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Applying an Instance-specific Model to Longitudinal Clinical Data for Prediction.将特定实例模型应用于纵向临床数据进行预测。
Proc IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform Imaging Syst Biol. 2011 Jul;2011:81-88. doi: 10.1109/HISB.2011.12. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
7
Personalized Modeling for Prediction with Decision-Path Models.使用决策路径模型进行预测的个性化建模
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0131022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131022. eCollection 2015.
8
Decision path models for patient-specific modeling of patient outcomes.用于患者结局个体化建模的决策路径模型。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:413-21. eCollection 2013.
9
Bayesian rule learning for biomedical data mining.贝叶斯规则学习在生物医学数据挖掘中的应用。
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):668-75. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq005. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
10
Computational modeling for bedside application.床边应用的计算建模
Heart Fail Clin. 2008 Jul;4(3):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2008.02.009.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting dire outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia.预测社区获得性肺炎患者的严重后果。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):347-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.005. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
2
Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review.逻辑回归与人工神经网络分类模型:方法学综述
J Biomed Inform. 2002 Oct-Dec;35(5-6):352-9. doi: 10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00034-0.
3
Processes and outcomes of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) cohort study.社区获得性肺炎患者的护理过程与结局:肺炎患者结局研究团队(PORT)队列研究的结果
Arch Intern Med. 1999 May 10;159(9):970-80. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.9.970.
4
Assessing predictive accuracy: how to compare Brier scores.评估预测准确性:如何比较布里尔分数。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1141-6. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90146-z.