Nickers Philippe, Coppens Luc, de Leval Jean, Jansen Nicolas, Deneufbourg Jean-Marie
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, Domaine Universitarie du Sarrt Tilman, Belgium.
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jun;79(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
To evaluate on 201 locally advanced prostatic cancers prospectively treated in a phase II trial, the efficacy of a combination of external beam radiotherapy (39.6 Gy) and (192)Ir low dose rate brachytherapy (Bt) (40-45 Gy).
Sixty-four patients were included in the intermediate prognosis group with only one of the following adverse factors (PSA > 10 ng/ml, Gleason score > or = 7 or clinical stage > or =T2b) and 137 in the unfavourable group when at least two of these factors were present.
The actuarial 4 years biochemical no evidence of disease is 82.8% for the entire population. It is, respectively, 97 and 76% in the intermediate and unfavourable prognosis groups (P < 0.0001). Grade > or =3 late urinary complications occurred in 13 patients (6.5%). Eight patients (4%) presented late grade 2 rectal complications but no grades 3-5 was observed.
Even if an alpha/beta of 1.5-3 Gy theoretically favours the use of a high dose rate mode of irradiation, the early results presented here are as good as those reported for similar groups of patients with high dose rate treatments. Late toxicity is identical but our urinary toxicity is within the less favourable and rectal toxicity within the most favourable results. We can postulate that while inducing very high hyperdosage regions (V150) mainly focused on the peripheral zone, most of the Bt techniques consist of a more ablative treatment. Many of the radiobiological studies on Bt did not in fact take into account the heterogeneity of irradiation inside the CTV. This study highlights the need to explore pulsed dose rate therapies, permanent implant and new available radioisotopes such as (169)Ytterbium that will offer the safety of low and lower dose rates. The actual late toxicity of the different Bt techniques is not yet inexistent indeed.
在一项II期试验中对201例局部晚期前列腺癌患者进行前瞻性治疗,评估外照射放疗(39.6 Gy)与铱-192低剂量率近距离放疗(Bt)(40 - 45 Gy)联合治疗的疗效。
64例患者归入中度预后组,仅具有以下不良因素之一(前列腺特异性抗原>10 ng/ml、Gleason评分>或=7或临床分期>或=T2b),137例患者归入不良预后组,即存在至少两项上述因素。
整个研究人群4年无生化疾病证据的精算生存率为82.8%。中度和不良预后组分别为97%和76%(P<0.0001)。13例患者(6.5%)出现≥3级晚期泌尿系统并发症。8例患者(4%)出现2级晚期直肠并发症,但未观察到3 - 5级并发症。
即使理论上1.5 - 3 Gy的α/β比值有利于高剂量率照射模式的应用,但此处呈现的早期结果与高剂量率治疗的类似患者群体报告的结果一样好。晚期毒性相同,但我们的泌尿系统毒性处于较不理想范围,直肠毒性处于最理想结果范围内。我们可以推测,虽然Bt技术在诱导主要集中在外周区的非常高的超剂量区域(V150)时,但大多数Bt技术构成一种更具消融性的治疗。实际上,许多关于Bt的放射生物学研究并未考虑靶区内照射的异质性。本研究强调需要探索脉冲剂量率疗法、永久性植入以及新的可用放射性同位素,如镱-169,其将提供低剂量率和更低剂量率的安全性。不同Bt技术的实际晚期毒性确实并非不存在。