Boden William E, O'rourke Robert A, Teo Koon K, Hartigan Pamela M, Maron David J, Kostuk William, Knudtson Merril, Dada Marcin, Casperson Paul, Harris Crystal L, Spertus John A, Shaw Leslee, Chaitman Bernard R, Mancini G B John, Berman Daniel S, Weintraub William S
VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Am Heart J. 2006 Jun;151(6):1173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.015.
Major improvements in medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary heart disease have occurred during the past decade, but no randomized trial has compared these 2 strategies for the "hard" clinical end points of death or myocardial infarction nor have earlier studies incorporated the use of coronary stents and aggressive multifaceted medical therapy during long-term follow-up.
The COURAGE trial is a multicenter study of patients with documented myocardial ischemia and angiographically confirmed single or multivessel coronary artery disease who are randomized to a strategy of PCI plus intensive medical therapy or intensive medical therapy alone. Medical therapy in both groups is guideline-driven and includes: aspirin, clopidogrel, simvastatin (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target 60-85 mg/dL), long-acting metoprolol and/or amlodipine, lisinopril or losartan, and long-acting nitrates, as well as lifestyle interventions. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause mortality or acute myocardial infarction, and there will be 85% power to detect an absolute 4.6% (relative 22%) difference between strategies. The principal hypothesis is that PCI plus aggressive medical therapy (projected event rate 16.4%) will be superior to aggressive medical therapy alone (projected event rate 21%) during a 2.5- to 7-year (median of 5 years) follow-up.
COURAGE is the largest prospective randomized trial of PCI versus intensive medical therapy to date and will define the incremental benefits of PCI in the setting of contemporary optimal medical therapy for chronic coronary heart disease. A total of 2287 patients have been enrolled, and follow-up will conclude in June 2006.
在过去十年中,冠心病的药物治疗和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)取得了重大进展,但尚无随机试验比较这两种策略对死亡或心肌梗死等“硬”临床终点的影响,早期研究也未纳入在长期随访中使用冠状动脉支架和积极的多方面药物治疗。
“勇气”试验是一项多中心研究,纳入有记录的心肌缺血且经血管造影证实为单支或多支冠状动脉疾病的患者,将其随机分为PCI加强化药物治疗组或单纯强化药物治疗组。两组的药物治疗均遵循指南,包括:阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、辛伐他汀(低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标值为60 - 85mg/dL)、长效美托洛尔和/或氨氯地平、赖诺普利或氯沙坦、长效硝酸盐类药物,以及生活方式干预。主要终点是全因死亡率或急性心肌梗死的复合终点,检测两种策略之间绝对4.6%(相对22%)差异的效能为85%。主要假设是在2.5至7年(中位时间为5年)的随访中,PCI加积极药物治疗(预计事件发生率16.4%)将优于单纯积极药物治疗(预计事件发生率21%)。
“勇气”试验是迄今为止关于PCI与强化药物治疗的最大规模前瞻性随机试验,将确定在当代慢性冠心病最佳药物治疗背景下PCI的增量获益。共有2287例患者入组,随访将于2006年6月结束。