• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的癌症登记处(美国)中种族/族裔的错误分类。

Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry (United States).

作者信息

Gomez Scarlett L, Glaser Sally L

机构信息

Northern California Cancer Center, 2201 Walnut Avenue, Suite 300, Fremont, CA 94538, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Aug;17(6):771-81. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0013-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-006-0013-y
PMID:16783605
Abstract

Cancer registry data on race/ethnicity are vital for understanding cancer patterns in population subgroups, as they inform public health policies for allocating resources and form the bases of etiologic hypotheses. However, accuracy of cancer registry data on race/ethnicity has not been systematically evaluated. By comparing race/ethnicity in the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry to self-reported race/ethnicity for patients from 14 racial/ethnic groups, we determined the accuracy of this variable and the patient and hospital characteristics associated with disagreement. The extent of misclassification (measured by sensitivity and predictive value positive (PV+)) varied across racial/ethnic groups (total n=11,676). Sensitivities and PV+'s were high (exceeding 90%) for non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks, moderate for Hispanics and some Asian subgroups (70-90%), and very low for American Indians (<20%). Overall, registry and interview race/ethnicity disagreed for 11% of the sample. In a multivariate model, disagreement was associated with non-White race/ethnicity, younger age, being married, being foreign-born but preferring to speak English, and diagnosis in a large hospital. Improving data quality for race/ethnicity will be most effectively attempted at the reporting source. We advocate a concerted effort to systematize collection of these patient data across all facilities, which may be more feasible given electronic medical admissions forms.

摘要

种族/族裔的癌症登记数据对于了解人群亚组中的癌症模式至关重要,因为它们为分配资源的公共卫生政策提供信息,并构成病因假设的基础。然而,种族/族裔的癌症登记数据的准确性尚未得到系统评估。通过将大湾区癌症登记处的种族/族裔与14个种族/族裔群体患者自我报告的种族/族裔进行比较,我们确定了该变量的准确性以及与不一致相关的患者和医院特征。错误分类的程度(以敏感性和阳性预测值(PV+)衡量)因种族/族裔群体而异(总数n = 11,676)。非西班牙裔白人和黑人的敏感性和PV+较高(超过90%),西班牙裔和一些亚洲亚组中等(70 - 90%),美洲印第安人则非常低(<20%)。总体而言,登记处和访谈中的种族/族裔在11%的样本中存在不一致。在多变量模型中,不一致与非白人种族/族裔、年轻、已婚、外国出生但更喜欢说英语以及在大型医院诊断有关。提高种族/族裔数据质量最有效的方法是在报告源进行尝试。我们主张齐心协力在所有医疗机构中系统地收集这些患者数据,如果有电子医疗入院表格,这可能更可行。

相似文献

1
Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry (United States).基于人群的癌症登记处(美国)中种族/族裔的错误分类。
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Aug;17(6):771-81. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0013-y.
2
Collecting information on race, Hispanic ethnicity, and birthplace of cancer patients: policies and practices in Connecticut hospitals.收集癌症患者的种族、西班牙裔血统和出生地信息:康涅狄格州医院的政策与实践
Ethn Dis. 2005 Winter;15(1):90-6.
3
Race and ethnicity coding agreement between hospitals and between hospital and death data.医院之间以及医院与死亡数据之间的种族和族裔编码协议。
Med Sci Monit. 2008 Mar;14(3):SR9-13.
4
Race and ethnicity in public health surveillance: criteria for the scientific use of social categories.公共卫生监测中的种族与族裔:社会类别科学应用的标准
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):7-15.
5
Quality of cancer registry birthplace data for Hispanics living in the United States.美国西班牙裔人群癌症登记出生地数据的质量
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Aug;16(6):713-23. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0694-7.
6
Race and ethnicity: comparing medical records to self-reports.种族与族裔:医学记录与自我报告的比较
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005(35):72-4. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi041.
7
The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States.美国死亡证明上种族和西班牙裔血统报告的有效性。
Vital Health Stat 2. 2008 Oct(148):1-23.
8
Validation of ethnicity in cancer data: which Hispanics are we misclassifying?癌症数据中种族划分的验证:我们将哪些西班牙裔人错误分类了?
J Registry Manag. 2009 Summer;36(2):42-6.
9
Categorizing race and ethnicity in the HMO Cancer Research Network.在健康维护组织癌症研究网络中对种族和族裔进行分类。
Ethn Dis. 2002 Winter;12(1):135-40.
10
Race/ethnicity in medical charts and administrative databases of patients served by community health centers.社区卫生中心服务患者的病历和行政数据库中的种族/族裔情况。
Ethn Dis. 2006 Spring;16(2):483-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Analysis of Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders with Early Onset Colorectal Cancer.对早发性结直肠癌的夏威夷原住民及其他太平洋岛民的综合分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jul 28;56(1):164. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01278-w.
2
Validating the Data Completeness and Accuracy of the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry.验证加拿大囊性纤维化登记处的数据完整性和准确性。
Can Respir J. 2025 Jul 1;2025:8893074. doi: 10.1155/carj/8893074. eCollection 2025.
3
Quantifying the burden of cancer in Puerto Rico's oldest residents.
量化波多黎各老年居民的癌症负担。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;97:102838. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2025.102838. Epub 2025 May 22.
4
Statistical Accuracy of Administratively Recorded Race/Ethnicity in the Military Health System and Race/Ethnicity Ascertained via Questionnaire.军事卫生系统中行政记录的种族/族裔信息以及通过问卷调查确定的种族/族裔信息的统计准确性。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02351-7.
5
Incidence Rate Trends of Breast Cancer Overall and by Molecular Subtype by Race and Ethnicity and Age.按种族、民族和年龄划分的乳腺癌总体及分子亚型的发病率趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2456142. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56142.
6
Advancing inclusive research calculator for oncology disease areas: A resource to support the development of enrollment targets in diversity action plans for industry sponsors.推进肿瘤疾病领域的包容性研究计算器:一种为行业赞助商的多样性行动计划制定入组目标提供支持的资源。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0315283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315283. eCollection 2024.
7
Racial and Ethnic Variation in Survival in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.早发性结直肠癌患者生存的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446820. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46820.
8
A population-based study on incidence trends of small intestine cancer in the United States from 2000 to 2020.基于人群的研究:美国 2000 年至 2020 年小肠癌发病率趋势。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0307019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307019. eCollection 2024.
9
Multiple myeloma incidence and mortality trends in the United States, 1999-2020.美国多发性骨髓瘤发病率和死亡率趋势,1999-2020 年。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65590-4.
10
Identifying Common Data Elements to Achieve Injury-related Health Equity Across the Lifespan: A Consensus-Driven Approach.确定通用数据元素以实现全生命周期与伤害相关的健康公平:一种共识驱动的方法。
Health Equity. 2024 Apr 3;8(1):249-253. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0044. eCollection 2024.