Davis Stephanie, Affatato Anthony
Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Bi-County Hospital, Warren, MI 48089, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;24(4):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.022.
Minor chest wall trauma is a common complaint in the emergency department (ED) (Barnea Y, Kashtan H, Skornick Y, Werbin N. Isolated rib fractures in elderly patients: mortality and morbidity. Can J of Surgery 2002;45(1):43-6; Lee RB, Bass SM, Morris JA, Mackenzie EJ. Three or more rib fractures as an indicator for transfer to a level I trauma center. J Trauma 1990;30:689-94; Dubinsky I, Low A. Non-life-threatening blunt chest trauma: Appropriate investigation and treatment. Am J Emerg Med 1997;15(3):240-3). Up to 50% of rib fractures may be missed on standard x-ray (Ziegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma 1994;37:975-9; Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Hospital-treated minimal-trauma rib fractures in elderly Finns: long-term trends and projections for the future. Osteoperosis International). Little consensus exists among emergency physicians with respect to the workup of minor blunt chest trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency physicians in interpreting rib radiographs and to determine if that interpretation resulted in any variance in treatment patterns. Our study is a retrospective study of 271 charts from a community-based teaching hospital from August 2000 to August 2002. Patients were excluded if they suffered major trauma. The treatment rendered was categorized. Categories included over-the-counter medication, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, narcotics, and muscle relaxants. The overall chi2 calculation showed no differences between the fractured group and the no fracture group (P=.072). From this, it can be concluded that there were no between-group differences in drugs prescribed based on whether a fracture was diagnosed by the ED physician. Indicating that the interpretation of the rib series does not influence the physicians treatment plan.
轻微胸壁创伤是急诊科常见的就诊原因(Barnea Y、Kashtan H、Skornick Y、Werbin N.老年患者孤立性肋骨骨折:死亡率和发病率。《加拿大外科杂志》2002年;45(1):43 - 6;Lee RB、Bass SM、Morris JA、Mackenzie EJ.三根或更多肋骨骨折作为转至一级创伤中心的指标。《创伤杂志》1990年;30:689 - 94;Dubinsky I、Low A.非危及生命的钝性胸外伤:适当的检查和治疗。《美国急诊医学杂志》1997年;15(3):240 - 3)。在标准X线检查中,高达50%的肋骨骨折可能会被漏诊(Ziegler DW、Agarwal NN.肋骨骨折的发病率和死亡率。《创伤杂志》1994年;37:975 - 9;Palvanen M、Kannus P、Niemi S、Parkkari J.芬兰老年人因轻微创伤住院治疗的肋骨骨折:长期趋势及未来预测。《骨质疏松国际》)。急诊医生对于轻微钝性胸外伤的检查方法几乎没有达成共识。本研究的目的是评估急诊医生解读肋骨X光片的准确性,并确定这种解读是否会导致治疗模式出现差异。我们的研究是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2000年8月至2002年8月期间一家社区教学医院的271份病历。如果患者遭受严重创伤则被排除。所给予的治疗进行分类。类别包括非处方药、非甾体抗炎药、麻醉药和肌肉松弛剂。总体卡方计算显示骨折组和无骨折组之间没有差异(P = 0.072)。由此可以得出结论,根据急诊医生是否诊断出骨折,所开药物在组间没有差异。这表明肋骨系列检查的解读不会影响医生的治疗计划。