Schlesinger Mark, Gray Bradford H
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):W287-303. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w287. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
Skeptics question nonprofit health care on the grounds that nonprofits fail to distinguish themselves from their for-profit counterparts and do not reliably provide community benefits commensurate with their tax subsidies. Drawing on the most recent and comprehensive evidence, we assess these charges, judging them to be either wrong or incomplete. Although conventional critiques are therefore unconvincing, there are nonetheless important challenges facing the nonprofit sector in American medicine. To address these, we propose reformulating ownership-related policies to define both the appropriate forms of community benefit and the appropriate mix of ownership in terms of local markets and communities.
怀疑论者对非营利性医疗保健提出质疑,理由是非营利性机构未能将自己与营利性同行区分开来,也未能可靠地提供与其税收补贴相称的社区福利。基于最新和全面的证据,我们评估了这些指控,认为它们要么是错误的,要么是不完整的。因此,尽管传统的批评缺乏说服力,但美国医疗领域的非营利部门仍面临着重要挑战。为解决这些问题,我们建议重新制定与所有权相关的政策,以根据当地市场和社区确定适当的社区福利形式和适当的所有权组合。